10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION• southern <strong>Alameda</strong> Creek watershed, encompasses 175 square miles, of which 36,000 acres, orapproximately one-third, are owned by the <strong>SFPUC</strong>. 2 <strong>SFPUC</strong>’s <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> holdings aresplit between <strong>Alameda</strong> (23,000 acres) and Santa Clara (13,000 acres) Counties. The <strong>SFPUC</strong>ownedlands contain two reservoirs – the San Antonio Reservoir to the north and the CalaverasReservoir to the south. Interstate 680 (I-680) and State Route (SR 84) meet in the northernportion of the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong>, and Calaveras Road extends in a north-south direction downthe center of the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong>. Milpitas and Fremont lie to the west, and Pleasanton andLivermore are located to the northeast. Figure II-2 provides a schematic delineation of the<strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong>, while Figure II-3 shows the <strong>Watershed</strong> on a topographic base. For purposesof the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, the <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> is divided into “primary and “secondary”<strong>Watershed</strong> lands (see Figure II-2). The primary <strong>Watershed</strong> lands are defined as the areas wherelocal drainage is collected, treated, and used as part of the <strong>SFPUC</strong> water supply system. Underexisting conditions, the primary <strong>Watershed</strong> lands drain directly to San Antonio and CalaverasReservoirs. In the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>, the primary <strong>Watershed</strong> also includes drainage to <strong>Alameda</strong>Creek just downstream of the Sunol Valley Water Treatment <strong>Plan</strong>t (WTP) to the site of aproposed water release and recapture facility that would be used for fisheries enhancement (seeSection II.C.1.0). Secondary <strong>Watershed</strong> lands are defined as <strong>SFPUC</strong>-owned lands that do notdrain into the <strong>SFPUC</strong> water supply system for drinking water uses. Under existing conditions,these areas drain to <strong>Alameda</strong> Creek downstream of the two reservoirs. In the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>,the secondary <strong>Watershed</strong> lands are identified as <strong>Alameda</strong> Creek drainage areas downstream fromthe proposed water release and recapture facility. Section III.D, Hydrology and Water Quality,includes a more detailed description of the hydrologic system and the primary and secondary<strong>Watershed</strong> areas of the <strong>SFPUC</strong>-owned lands.3.0 MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEWThe <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> is presented in six chapters. An Introduction(Chapter 1.0) is followed by a discussion of Existing Conditions and Resource Sensitivity(Chapter 2.0). Chapter 3.0 briefly describes the major <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Issues.Chapter 4.0 takes the major management issue areas (established in Chapter 3.0) and describes<strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Goals and Policies for each of these issue areas. Chapter 5.0 presentsthe actions and guidelines that form the basis of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. Chapter 6.0 provides adiscussion of Phasing and Implementation.The <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> was designed to improve the <strong>SFPUC</strong>’s ability to protect its overall<strong>Watershed</strong> in general, and in particular the specific resources that make up that <strong>Watershed</strong>.Given the intention behind the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> design, the overall environmental impacts of the<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> are beneficial. However, some actions also have the potential to causephysical impacts on the environment. These management actions are described in Table II-1 (atthe end of this chapter). Analysis of these actions forms the core of this EIR.2 This 36,000 acres does not include Sheep Camp, Bernal Property, and Arroyo de La Laguna, also owned by the<strong>SFPUC</strong>. It does include <strong>SFPUC</strong>-owned land leased to East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD).NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> II-4 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!