10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACTSP. CUMULATIVE ANALYSISdisadvantage of Apperson Quarry due to high startup and operating costs (as a hard rock quarryrequiring blasting) and greater distance from markets than the Sunol Valley quarries, it is unlikelythat the Apperson Quarry will commence operations while the Sunol Valley quarries areoperating at sufficient capacity to meet market demands. Therefore, traffic impacts would not becumulatively significant on local roads, and would represent a very small, less than significantnumber relative to the capacity of I-680.REFERENCES – Cumulative Analysis_________________________Except where indicated, references are on file at the San Francisco <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department.<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, SMP-17 Apperson Ridge Quarry Environmental ImpactReport, 1984. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ningDepartment, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Mission Rock Company SMP-24 Initial Study, 1985.(Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department,Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution R-86-62 conditionally approving SMP-24,1986. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ningDepartment, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution R-86-62 incorporating, revising, andconditionally approving SMP-24, 1991. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County CommunityDevelopment Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Santa Clara Sand & Gravel SMP-30 Expanded InitialStudy and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, 1992a. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong>County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution 93-32 conditionally approving Santa ClaraSand & Gravel SMP-30, 1992b. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community DevelopmentAgency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Mission Valley Rock Company Surface Mining Permitand Reclamation <strong>Plan</strong>, SMP-32, Draft Environmental Impact Report, 1994a. (Available at<strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Hayward,California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Mission Valley Rock Company Surface Mining Permitand Reclamation <strong>Plan</strong>, SMP-32, Final Environmental Impact Report and Appendices,1994b. (Available at <strong>Alameda</strong> County Community Development Agency <strong>Plan</strong>ningDepartment, Hayward, California)<strong>Alameda</strong> County <strong>Plan</strong>ning Department, Resolution R-94-461 certifying and adopting the EIR,adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and conditionallyapproving Surface Mining Permit and Reclamation <strong>Plan</strong>, SMP-32, 1994c. (Available atNOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> III.P-7 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!