10.07.2015 Views

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONS<strong>Management</strong>Action Number 1 Summary of <strong>Management</strong> Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3cul11cul12Periodically inspect historic structures for pest damage and use IPM techniques to control pestsin historic structures. (Phase 2B)Periodically monitor known significant cultural resource sites for evidence of disturbance,damage, or vandalism. (Phase 2B)No No NoNo No NoEnvironmental Compliance (env)env1env2env3env4env5env6Assign environmental compliance duties to an existing or new LRMS staff member to overseeand facilitate all environmental compliance within the <strong>Watershed</strong>. (Phase 2)Review new projects or activities to determine if such activities qualify as a “project” as definedby CEQA. If activity is subject to CEQA, determine whether subsequent environmental review isneeded. (Phase A)Require consultation with the LRMS environmental compliance staff member as a condition of allnew leases and renewals granted within the <strong>Watershed</strong>. (Phase A)Require that <strong>SFPUC</strong> staff consult and get assistance from environmental compliance staffmember prior to implementation of <strong>Watershed</strong> activities. (Phase A)Incorporate mitigation measures identified in the program-level EIR into the <strong>Alameda</strong><strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. (Phase 1)Provide comments on environmental documents for projects within the greater hydrologic<strong>Watershed</strong> to ensure that potential adverse effects on <strong>SFPUC</strong> lands are mitigated. (Phase A)No No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No No_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the <strong>SFPUC</strong> to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: <strong>Alameda</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> II-38 ESA / 930385January <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!