SFPUC 2001 Alameda Watershed Management Plan

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONTABLE II-1 (Continued)SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ACTIONSManagementAction Number 1 Summary of Management Actions 2 PotentialAdversePhysicalEffectsAnalyzedin thisProgram-Level EIRMay RequireProject-SpecificEnvironmentalReview 3haz10haz11haz12Require CalTrans to include spill containment and diversion facilities in new and upgradedfacilities along I-680 and Route 84. (Phase A)Practice interagency spill response. Where needed, improve elapsed time between spill event andnotification of SFPUC staff. (Phase 1B)In coordination with Chevron, conduct ongoing monitoring of the pipeline for potentialhazards. (Phase 1B)No No NoNo No NoNo No NoWaste – Human and Animal (was)was1was2was3was4Roads (roa)roa1roa2Inspect all SFPUC facilities to assess conditions of vault, chemical, and composting toilets;repair/replace as necessary to minimize risk of contamination of water supplies. (Phase 2)Inspect sanitation and waste treatment systems at Sunol Valley Golf Course to assess condition,performance, and impacts on surface and groundwater quality. (Phase 2)Assess the contribution of wildlife excrement to water quality degradation. Based on monitoring,develop management strategy if necessary. (Phase 3)Consult with Alameda and Santa Clara Counties regarding new residential development.(Phase A)Evaluate, rank the importance of, and implement modifications to the existing road system toreduce erosion and sedimentation. (Phase 1)Relocate existing high use roads/road segments in proximity to streams that are the primarysource of excessive erosion and sedimentation, wherever possible. (Phase 1)Yes Yes NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No NoNo No NoYes Yes Yes_________________________1 Inclusion does not ensure that funding, staff, or equipment will be made available to implement these actions, nor does it obligate the SFPUC to implement actions it chooses not to.2 Phasing of the management actions is identified by one or more of the following categories: (1) Phase 1 – within 5 years of Management Plan adoption; (2) Phase 2 – within 10 years ofadoption; (3) Phase 3 – within 20 years of adoption; and/or (A) on an as-needed basis, and (B) at regular intervals throughout the life of the Management Plan.3 MEA would require examination of these actions, when proposed, to determine if further CEQA project-level environmental review of these actions were necessary.NOP 96.223E: Alameda Watershed Management Plan II-27 ESA / 930385January 2001