23.11.2012 Views

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

proven. It is assumed that introducing infested camelids could reintroduce the disease into<br />

the sheep population. Therefore, the likelihood of exposure is assessed to be low but nonnegligible.<br />

33.2.3. Consequence assessment<br />

E. granulosus can infest cattle, sheep <strong>and</strong> goats, pigs, camelids, wild <strong>and</strong> feral ruminants,<br />

<strong>and</strong> macropods such as wallabies that occur in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Wild <strong>and</strong> feral animals could<br />

be involved in maintaining <strong>and</strong> disseminating the parasite to dogs. The presence of the<br />

parasite in animals other than sheep could result in transmission to sheep <strong>and</strong> the reestablishment<br />

of a sheep/dog cycle <strong>and</strong> sporadic cases of human disease.<br />

Re-establishment of the parasite in a dog/sheep cycle in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> would have<br />

consequences for human health. Neither dogs nor intermediate hosts develop clinical signs<br />

of infestation, <strong>and</strong> control or re-eradication programmes would be implemented on human<br />

health grounds (Pharo 2002). This could be a lengthy <strong>and</strong> expensive process dependent on<br />

the extent to which the parasite has become dispersed.<br />

In view of the above, the consequence assessment is assessed to be non-negligible.<br />

33.2.4. Risk Estimation<br />

Since entry, exposure, <strong>and</strong> consequence assessments are all non-negligible, the <strong>risk</strong><br />

estimate is non-negligible <strong>and</strong> E. granulosus is classified as a hazard in the commodity.<br />

Therefore, <strong>risk</strong> management measures may be justified.<br />

33.3. RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

33.3.1. Options<br />

The following points were considered when drafting options for the effective management<br />

of Echinococcus granulosus in the commodity:<br />

� New Zeal<strong>and</strong> has eradicated E. granulosus.<br />

� Hydatid-free flocks or herds are not defined in the Code <strong>and</strong> it is doubtful if the<br />

disease is reportable in most countries.<br />

� No reliable tests are available for the ante-mortem diagnosis of hydatid cysts in<br />

intermediate hosts. Serological tests have low sensitivity <strong>and</strong> are not generally<br />

available.<br />

� Premise freedom is not a practical option because hydatids can be diagnosed in<br />

intermediate hosts only by post-mortem inspection of offal. Therefore, the only<br />

properties that could claim historical freedom would be those that regularly sent a<br />

significant number of animals to slaughter at a plant where hydatids was recorded if<br />

found. This is unlikely to be feasible, particularly for properties that have only<br />

camelids <strong>and</strong> where the disease is not notifiable.<br />

� Newly developed vaccines for ruminants show promise but are not yet available for<br />

general use.<br />

122 ● <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!