23.11.2012 Views

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� Although quarantine is not suitable as a means of preventing the introduction of the<br />

organism, it is useful in preventing the introduction of ticks that could be carrying<br />

the organism.<br />

� Testing while in quarantine could be used to ensure that animals in the incubation<br />

period are not imported. The Manual lists the CFT as a suitable alternative test<br />

when screening animals for importation.<br />

� There are no suitable vaccines or treatments.<br />

� Economic impacts of introduction are likely to be minimal.<br />

� Introduction could result in sporadic cases of severe human disease.<br />

� There is no chapter on Q fever in the Code.<br />

One or a combination of the following measures could be considered in order to effectively<br />

manage the <strong>risk</strong>s.<br />

1. Animals to be imported could be tested with a serological test such as the CFT with<br />

negative results within 7 days of shipment.<br />

N.B. This measure would not exclude the entry of animals that are incubating<br />

the disease when tested.<br />

2. Animals to be imported could be isolated in tick-free premises <strong>and</strong> maintained tickfree<br />

as specified in the tick section for at least 30 days <strong>and</strong> tested with a serological<br />

test with negative results within 7 days of shipment.<br />

N.B. This measure would ensure that animals do not become infected by ticks<br />

while in quarantine <strong>and</strong> ensures that if an animal were to be incubating the<br />

disease when introduced into quarantine it would be likely to be detected by the<br />

serological test.<br />

3. Animals could be isolated <strong>and</strong> maintained tick-free as described above <strong>and</strong> tested<br />

twice with an interval of 3 weeks while in PEQ with a serological test with negative<br />

results.<br />

References<br />

References marked * were sighted as abstracts in electronic data-bases.<br />

Behymer D, Riemann HP (1989). Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />

Medical Association, 194, 764-7.<br />

Hatchette T, Campbell N, Hudson R, Raoult D, Marrie TJ (2003). Natural history of Q fever in goats.<br />

Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases, 3(1), 11-5.*<br />

Hawker Jl, Ayres JG, Blair L (1998). A large outbreak of Q fever in the West Midl<strong>and</strong>s, a windborne spread<br />

to a metropolitan area? Communicable Diseases <strong>and</strong> Public Health, 1(3), 180-7.*<br />

Jensenius M, Mael<strong>and</strong> A, Kvale D, Farstad IN, Vene S, Bruu AL (1997). Q-fever imported into Norway.<br />

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening, 117(27), 3937-40.<br />

MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries ● 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!