Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...
Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...
Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� Although quarantine is not suitable as a means of preventing the introduction of the<br />
organism, it is useful in preventing the introduction of ticks that could be carrying<br />
the organism.<br />
� Testing while in quarantine could be used to ensure that animals in the incubation<br />
period are not imported. The Manual lists the CFT as a suitable alternative test<br />
when screening animals for importation.<br />
� There are no suitable vaccines or treatments.<br />
� Economic impacts of introduction are likely to be minimal.<br />
� Introduction could result in sporadic cases of severe human disease.<br />
� There is no chapter on Q fever in the Code.<br />
One or a combination of the following measures could be considered in order to effectively<br />
manage the <strong>risk</strong>s.<br />
1. Animals to be imported could be tested with a serological test such as the CFT with<br />
negative results within 7 days of shipment.<br />
N.B. This measure would not exclude the entry of animals that are incubating<br />
the disease when tested.<br />
2. Animals to be imported could be isolated in tick-free premises <strong>and</strong> maintained tickfree<br />
as specified in the tick section for at least 30 days <strong>and</strong> tested with a serological<br />
test with negative results within 7 days of shipment.<br />
N.B. This measure would ensure that animals do not become infected by ticks<br />
while in quarantine <strong>and</strong> ensures that if an animal were to be incubating the<br />
disease when introduced into quarantine it would be likely to be detected by the<br />
serological test.<br />
3. Animals could be isolated <strong>and</strong> maintained tick-free as described above <strong>and</strong> tested<br />
twice with an interval of 3 weeks while in PEQ with a serological test with negative<br />
results.<br />
References<br />
References marked * were sighted as abstracts in electronic data-bases.<br />
Behymer D, Riemann HP (1989). Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />
Medical Association, 194, 764-7.<br />
Hatchette T, Campbell N, Hudson R, Raoult D, Marrie TJ (2003). Natural history of Q fever in goats.<br />
Vector Borne Zoonotic Diseases, 3(1), 11-5.*<br />
Hawker Jl, Ayres JG, Blair L (1998). A large outbreak of Q fever in the West Midl<strong>and</strong>s, a windborne spread<br />
to a metropolitan area? Communicable Diseases <strong>and</strong> Public Health, 1(3), 180-7.*<br />
Jensenius M, Mael<strong>and</strong> A, Kvale D, Farstad IN, Vene S, Bruu AL (1997). Q-fever imported into Norway.<br />
Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening, 117(27), 3937-40.<br />
MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries ● 87