23.11.2012 Views

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

� The role of an IHS is to specify measures that must be complied with up to the<br />

point of biosecurity clearance for imported <strong>risk</strong> goods. An IHS cannot include<br />

obligations that apply post-clearance.<br />

� The parasite could not establish in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> unless cysts within carcasses were<br />

eaten by dogs. A Controlled Area Notice under s131 of the Biosecurity Act (issued<br />

by MAF on 5 th May 2010) prohibits the feeding of uncooked offal of camelids to<br />

dogs. If the provisions of that notice are followed by owners of camelids, the<br />

likelihood of hydatids transmission from imported camelids to dogs is negligible.<br />

There are no practical measures to effectively manage the <strong>risk</strong> of hydatids in camelids that<br />

are suitable for inclusion in an IHS on which to base a biosecurity clearance.<br />

However, there are several options for the effective management of the <strong>risk</strong> in a postborder<br />

setting. One or a combination of the following options could be considered:<br />

1. At the time of importation, importers could be provided with information to inform<br />

them of their obligations under the Controlled Area notice in regard to cooking<br />

offal of livestock prior to feeding it to dogs, <strong>and</strong> in regard to controlling dogs so<br />

that they cannot gain access to offal of animals that died on the premises. This<br />

information could be contained in the Guidance Document accompanying the IHS,<br />

or could be in another form.<br />

2. Obligations could be imposed on importers <strong>and</strong> subsequent owners of imported<br />

camelids (either by amending the current imported animals identification<br />

regulations D or by some other regulatory mechanism) to report imported animal<br />

deaths, thereby enabling oversight of appropriate carcass disposal.<br />

References<br />

References marked * were sighted as abstracts in electronic data-bases.<br />

Ahmadi N, Dalimi A (2006). Characterization of Echinococcus granulosus isolates from human, sheep <strong>and</strong><br />

camel in Iran. Infection, Genetics <strong>and</strong> Evolution, 6(2), 85-90.<br />

Gauci C, Heath D, Chow C, Lightowlers MW (2005). Hydatid disease: vaccinology <strong>and</strong> development of the<br />

EG95 recombinant vaccine. Expert Review of Vaccines, 4(1), 103-12.<br />

Guarnera EA, Parra A, Kamenetzky L, Garcia G, Gutierrez A (2004). Cystic echinococcosis in Argentina:<br />

evolution of metacestode <strong>and</strong> clinical expression in various Echinococcus granulosus strains. Acta Tropica, 92(2),<br />

153-9.*<br />

Heath DD, Holcman B (1997). Vaccination against echinococcus in perspective. Acta Tropica, 67(1-2), 37-41.<br />

Heath DD, Jensen O, Lightowlers MW (2003). Progress in control of hydatidosis using vaccination--a review<br />

of formulation <strong>and</strong> delivery of the vaccine <strong>and</strong> recommendations for practical use in control programmes. Acta<br />

Tropica, 85(2), 133-43.*<br />

D Biosecurity (<strong>Import</strong>ed Animals, Embryos, <strong>and</strong> Semen Information) Regulations 1999<br />

MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries ● 123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!