23.11.2012 Views

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� Mites, fleas <strong>and</strong> lice of camelids cause skin irritation <strong>and</strong> damage to fibre but are<br />

not known to cause serious disease or act as vectors for disease agents.<br />

� Steps should be taken to ensure that camelids do not introduce mites, lice <strong>and</strong> fleas<br />

into the quarantine station in which they will be isolated. Introduction of parasites<br />

into the facility could result in re-infestation of animals after successful treatment.<br />

� There are several efficacious insecticides that can be used for the elimination of the<br />

parasites.<br />

� There is no Code chapter relating to mites, fleas <strong>and</strong> lice.<br />

One or a combination of the following measures could be considered in order to effectively<br />

manage the <strong>risk</strong>s.<br />

1. Animals to be imported could be quarantined in isolation from other animals for at<br />

least 30 days before shipment; <strong>and</strong><br />

2. Within the 4 days before entry into the quarantine station animals could be treated<br />

with an insecticide known to be effective against mites, fleas <strong>and</strong> lice. Animals that<br />

have not been recently shorn could be shorn before treatment; <strong>and</strong><br />

3. Animals could again be treated with an effective insecticide 7-10 days after entry<br />

into isolation <strong>and</strong> again 10-14 days later. Different insecticides could be used at<br />

each treatment.<br />

N.B. These measures allow for treatment with insecticides thought to be effective against<br />

mites, lice <strong>and</strong> fleas but do not provide for confirmation of the effectiveness of the<br />

treatment undertaken.<br />

4. Animals for importation could undergo treatments as above. In addition they could<br />

be carefully inspected at the time of the second <strong>and</strong> third treatments to ensure that<br />

the previous treatments have been effective. If mites, lice or fleas are detected at the<br />

last inspection, treatments could be repeated until no parasites are found. Since<br />

populations of Psoroptes mites are known to leave residual populations in sites<br />

such as the axilla, groin, infra-orbital fossa <strong>and</strong> inner surface of the pinna <strong>and</strong><br />

auditory canal, these areas could require special attention when inspecting the<br />

animal.<br />

N.B. These measures allows for inspection as well as treatment.<br />

5. Treatment with 5ml of diluted ivermectin solution into each ear canal <strong>and</strong><br />

microscopic examination of saline flushings of both ear canals with negative results<br />

for Psoroptes ovis ear mites.<br />

N.B. This measure is specific for residual populations of mites in the ear canals of animals<br />

<strong>and</strong> reflects Australia’s level of protection for mitigating the <strong>risk</strong> of introducing Psoroptes<br />

ovis when importing camelids from Chile.<br />

6. Ten days after entering pre-export isolation saline flushings of both ear canals of<br />

each animal should be examined <strong>and</strong> found to be free of evidence of P. ovis mites.<br />

If found then the animal should be treated with an ectoparasiticide effective against<br />

ear mites <strong>and</strong> re-examined 10 days later.<br />

134 ● <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!