23.11.2012 Views

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

Import risk analysis: Llamas (Lama glama) and alpacas (Vicugna ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vos & Turnbull 2004). However, one report attributes the death of two crias (young<br />

unweaned camelids) to the vaccine (Cartwright et al 1987).<br />

20.1.5. Hazard identification conclusion<br />

Anthrax is known to occur in camelids <strong>and</strong> the disease occurs in all countries relevant to<br />

this <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>. Therefore, B. anthracis is considered to be a potential hazard in the<br />

commodity.<br />

20.2. RISK ASSESSMENT<br />

20.2.1. Entry assessment<br />

Although anthrax is a rare disease it still occurs sporadically in a number of countries. The<br />

incubation period is short <strong>and</strong> camelids are susceptible, exhibiting obvious clinical signs of<br />

infection. Therefore, the likelihood of an imported animal being in the incubation period<br />

for the disease or carrying spores in its intestines is assessed to be very low but nonnegligible.<br />

20.2.2. Exposure assessment<br />

The Code chapter states: “There is no evidence that anthrax is transmitted by animals<br />

before the onset of clinical <strong>and</strong> pathological signs”. An imported animal that is in the<br />

incubation period for the disease would be likely to die. In the extremely unlikely event<br />

that an infected camelid is imported <strong>and</strong> dies from anthrax, it is highly improbable that its<br />

carcass would extensively contaminate the environment. The original outbreaks of anthrax<br />

in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> in the early 1900s resulted from the importation of thous<strong>and</strong>s of tons of<br />

unsterilised animal bones that were applied to pastures as fertiliser (Barry 1954). Despite<br />

this widespread practice <strong>and</strong> several outbreaks, B. anthracis never became established. An<br />

imported case of anthrax would not contaminate the environment to the same extent.<br />

However, other animals could become infected from contaminated soil or water, resulting<br />

in further spread of the organism <strong>and</strong> contamination of the environment. Therefore the <strong>risk</strong><br />

of exposure is considered to be very low but non-negligible.<br />

20.2.3. Consequence assessment<br />

Control measures would be introduced in response to an outbreak. Quarantine <strong>and</strong><br />

disinfection of infected areas <strong>and</strong> vaccination of animals would incur costs. In the long<br />

term, should the introduction lead to long term contamination of the environment,<br />

sporadic cases of anthrax could occur in humans <strong>and</strong> in animals. Therefore, the<br />

consequences of introduction are assessed as non-negligible.<br />

20.2.4. Risk estimation<br />

Since entry, exposure <strong>and</strong> consequence assessments are all non-negligible, the <strong>risk</strong> is<br />

assessed as non-negligible <strong>and</strong> B. anthracis is classified as a hazard in the commodity.<br />

Therefore, <strong>risk</strong> management measures may be justified.<br />

70 ● <strong>Import</strong> <strong>risk</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>: <strong>Llamas</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>alpacas</strong> from specified countries MAF Biosecurity New Zeal<strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!