12.07.2015 Views

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180<str<strong>on</strong>g>Nuclear</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Reset</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Arms Reducti<strong>on</strong> and N<strong>on</strong>proliferati<strong>on</strong>ers; of space militarizati<strong>on</strong> through placement of various weap<strong>on</strong>types into orbit (including those based <strong>on</strong> new physical principles);of withdrawal of the two countries from the 1972 ABM Treaty(a cornerst<strong>on</strong>e of the arms c<strong>on</strong>trol system); and of an overall collapseof the arms c<strong>on</strong>trol system in general.The Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> launched a large number of costly research programsto develop symmetrical and asymmetrical countermeasuresagainst the SDI: the symmetrical resp<strong>on</strong>ses included developmentof a multipurpose strike orbital system and a multi-layered missiledefense; the asymmetrical approaches focused mainly <strong>on</strong> the landbasedICBM group having greater power reserves than SLBMs in orderto penetrate all of the layers of U.S. missile defense. Developmentof several new types of ICBMs began, with plans to increase the numberof ICBMs from 1,398 to almost 1,700, including deploymentof over 1,000 mobile launchers carrying Topol ICBMs and smallKurier ICBMs in order to significantly increase the survivability andefficiency of the nuclear deterrent.Such were the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s during preparati<strong>on</strong>s for the START-Italks. Although subsequently tensi<strong>on</strong>s between the two superpowersgradually began to dissipate (especially after the two presidents metin Reykjavik in 1986), there nevertheless remained a c<strong>on</strong>siderableamount of mistrust between the two sides, as was fully reflectedin the final versi<strong>on</strong> of the treaty.The over 500-page Treaty c<strong>on</strong>sists of 19 articles; 38 agreed statements;seven protocols; numerous associated documents (such as lettersand other corresp<strong>on</strong>dence); 47 Joint Compliance and Inspecti<strong>on</strong>Commissi<strong>on</strong> (JCIC) agreements; 36 joint statements; 19 ‘S’ seriesjoint statements; a definiti<strong>on</strong>s annex; and annexes to the Inspecti<strong>on</strong>Protocol and MOU. One of the protocols related to the disintegrati<strong>on</strong>of the Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>sequent emergence of new partiesto the treaty (Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine) was signed in May1992. The Framework Agreement, defining c<strong>on</strong>tinued talks <strong>on</strong> strategicarms reducti<strong>on</strong>s and setting out the parties’ agreement to reducetheir strategic arsenals to 3,000-3,500 warheads, was signedin June 1992 and also became an integral part of the START-ITreaty.We shall list here <strong>on</strong>ly a porti<strong>on</strong> of the main START-I provisi<strong>on</strong>sthat are periodically discussed by officials and experts.The main c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for strategic arms reducti<strong>on</strong> and limitati<strong>on</strong> areoutlined in Article 2 of the Treaty. Aside from decreasing the num-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!