12.07.2015 Views

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96<str<strong>on</strong>g>Nuclear</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Reset</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Arms Reducti<strong>on</strong> and N<strong>on</strong>proliferati<strong>on</strong>negotiati<strong>on</strong>s rather than to pressure and threats of the use of force.The new U.S. administrati<strong>on</strong> signaled its readiness to engage in directdialogue with Iran, and the new U.S. president addressed the leadersand people of Iran in a video message in March 2009. However,the crisis of trust that has existed between the two sides c<strong>on</strong>tinuesto the present day to prevent advantage being taken of this “windowof opportunity” for resolving the situati<strong>on</strong> with the Iranian nuclearprogram that had opened following Barack Obama’s electi<strong>on</strong> as president.A new obstacle in the search for a resoluti<strong>on</strong> has arisen withthe deteriorati<strong>on</strong> of the domestic political situati<strong>on</strong> in Iran followingthe June 2009 presidential electi<strong>on</strong>, the results of which, accordingto oppositi<strong>on</strong> candidates, were falsified.The September 2009 discovery of yet <strong>on</strong>e more uranium enrichmentfacility under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> in Iran, this <strong>on</strong>e near the cityof Qom (based <strong>on</strong> IAEA data, the facility was designed for 3,000centrifuges and could have been completed by 2011) dealt anotherblow to the nuclear c<strong>on</strong>fidence-building process. 40Admittedly, a potential soluti<strong>on</strong> to the crisis did appear to be withinreach <strong>on</strong> October 1, 2009, when the secretary of Iran’s SupremeNati<strong>on</strong>al Security Council, Saeed Jalili, met in Geneva with the politicaldirectors of the P5+1 and Javier Solana, the EU high representativefor foreign affairs and security policy. The parties emerged withIran agreeing to send 75 percent of its low-enriched uranium (LEU)out of the country in exchange for the P5+1’s promise to produce fuelfrom that LEU for the Tehran Research Reactor.On October 21, IAEA experts proposed an arrangement forhow this would actually work. According to this plan, 75 percentof Iran’s LEU (some 1,200 kilograms) accumulated at the enrichmentfacility in Natanz was to be shipped to Russia by January 15,2010. The uranium hexafluoride would then undergo purificati<strong>on</strong>and enrichment at <strong>on</strong>e of the existing facilities in Russia (which hasan overall separati<strong>on</strong> capacity comprising 40-45 percent of the totalglobal capacity), where there is enough spare capacity to accept andfulfill Iran’s order expeditiously.Subsequently, the 19.75-percent enriched uranium was to be shippedto France (the technology to produce nuclear fuel for the Tehranreactor is currently available <strong>on</strong>ly in Argentina and France), whereit would then be made into fuel for the Tehran reactor and shippedback to Iran through Russia by the end of 2010. 41 The entire projectwas to be carried out <strong>on</strong> a commercial basis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!