12.07.2015 Views

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

Nuclear Reset - Program on Strategic Stability Evaluation (POSSE)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 24. Global Partnership493the Russian nuclear weap<strong>on</strong>s arsenal had been reduced to less than<strong>on</strong>e fifth of the size of the USSR arsenal.2. Physical protecti<strong>on</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>trol, and accounting for nuclear materials.All of the GP participants, including Russia, attach particularimportance to this subject. 8According to expert estimates, between 120 and 150 t<strong>on</strong>s of weap<strong>on</strong>s-gradeplut<strong>on</strong>ium and 1,000 to 1,350 t<strong>on</strong>s of highly-enriched uranium(enriched to 90-percent U-235) have been produced in the SovietUni<strong>on</strong>/Russia. 9 The United States believes that at the beginningof the 1990s Russia had 603 t<strong>on</strong>s of HEU and weap<strong>on</strong>s-grade plut<strong>on</strong>ium(very attractive for theft), and that 252 buildings at 40 differententerprises were in need of modernizati<strong>on</strong> of their nuclear materialssecurity systems. 10 According to official sources, 61 Russian organizati<strong>on</strong>shad access to nuclear materials in 2000. 11 Most of these weap<strong>on</strong>s-gradematerials are located in the “closed cities” of the RosatomState Atomic Energy Corporati<strong>on</strong>, as well as in certain enterprisesand research institutes near Moscow. The amount of nuclear materialat such sites varies from a few kilograms to several dozen t<strong>on</strong>s. 12The closest MPC&A cooperati<strong>on</strong> has developed between Russiaand the United States. 13 By the time the GP was established, the U.S.Department of Energy had installed safeguards systems completely ornearly completely in 115 of the 252 buildings housing the 192 t<strong>on</strong>sof weap<strong>on</strong>s-grade nuclear materials. Work had been completed at 81buildings c<strong>on</strong>taining 86 t<strong>on</strong>s of nuclear materials, while another 31buildings holding 106 t<strong>on</strong>s of nuclear materials had been subjectedto so-called “rapid upgrade.” Work had begun at sites holding an additi<strong>on</strong>al130 t<strong>on</strong>s of nuclear material. In 1999, the U.S. Departmentof Energy initiated its Material C<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> and C<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>Program</str<strong>on</strong>g> for Russia, under which Russia was to remove the nuclearmaterials from 50 buildings situated at five different companies by2010 and c<strong>on</strong>vert 24 t<strong>on</strong>s of HEU into LEU for storage. For variousreas<strong>on</strong>s, however, implementati<strong>on</strong> of this program has stalled. Between1993 and 2001, the United States spent a total of 797.3 milli<strong>on</strong> dollars<strong>on</strong> improvements to the Russian MPC&A <str<strong>on</strong>g>Program</str<strong>on</strong>g>. It allocated 293milli<strong>on</strong> dollars to the program in 2002; 235 milli<strong>on</strong> dollars in 2003;258.5 milli<strong>on</strong> dollars in 2004; and 294.7 milli<strong>on</strong> dollars in 2005. Since2006, the amount spent has been gradually declining, yet the U.S. allocati<strong>on</strong>shave increasingly focused more <strong>on</strong> similar programs in otherstates of the CIS. By 2020, the U.S. Department of Energy will havespent an estimated 2.2 billi<strong>on</strong> dollars <strong>on</strong> the MPC&A program. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!