12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110 8. Neptunium oxygen <strong>and</strong> hydrogen compounds <strong>and</strong> complexeslower <strong>neptunium</strong> concentrations, in the pH range above 10, if the solutions were passedthrough a filter with a small pore size (∼ 1 nm). It was suggested [85LIE/TRE] thatsorption <strong>of</strong> neutral species on the filter might lead to incorrect (low) solubility values.This may have happened in the work <strong>of</strong> Ewart et al.. It is also possible the water usedby Ewart et al. contained reducing agents after equilibration with the concrete.This said, the values summarised by Neck, Kim <strong>and</strong> Kanellakopulos [92NEC/KIM]were refitted using our selected value <strong>of</strong> ε (NpO+2 ,ClO − 4 ) = 0.25 kg·mol−1 . The resultingvalue for ε (Na + ,NpO 2 (OH) − 2 ) =−(0.01 ± 0.07) kg·mol−1 is accepted. Because thevalues for β 1 <strong>and</strong> β 2 from each set <strong>of</strong> solubility experiments are undoubtedly correlated,no attempt was made to weight the results from the different studies [85LIE/TRE,92ITA/NAK, 92NEC/KIM]. Instead the refitted values based on those tabulated byNeck, Kim <strong>and</strong> Kanellakopulos [92NEC/KIM] wereused(cf. Table 8.5). The uncertaintieswere based on the original experimental uncertainties <strong>and</strong>, for β 2 , increased tobe consistent with the values from the work <strong>of</strong> Itagaki et al. [92ITA/NAK].Thus, the formation constants (I = 0) have been estimated aslog10 ∗ β◦ 1 (8.1) =−(11.3 ± 0.7)(8.2) =−(23.6 ± 0.5)log ∗10 β◦ 2Thus,NpO + 2 + H 2O(l) Å NpO 2 OH(aq) + H + (8.1)NpO + 2 + 2H 2O(l) Å NpO 2 (OH) − 2 + 2H+ (8.2) f G ◦ m (NpO 2OH, aq, 298.15 K) = −(1080.4 ± 6.9) kJ·mol −1 f G ◦ m (NpO 2(OH) − 2, aq, 298.15 K) = −(1247.3 ± 6.3) kJ·mol−1Although there is evidence for formation <strong>of</strong> additional anionic hydrolysis speciesin strongly basic solutions [90TAN, 94TAN], the available data are not adequate tobe used to derive reliable values <strong>of</strong> the formation constants. Sets <strong>of</strong> Pitzer-equationion-interaction parameters have recently been reported for NpO + 2<strong>and</strong> Np(V) hydrolysisspecies [95FAN/NEC, 95NEC/FAN, 95NOV/ROB, 96RUN/NEU], <strong>and</strong> may beparticularly useful for modelling the behaviour <strong>of</strong> <strong>neptunium</strong>(V) in solutions containingNaCl at high molalities. However, no evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Pitzer-equation parametershas been carried out in the present review.The NpO + 2 ·H 3O + species proposed by Rösch et al. [87RÖS/MIL] is not acceptedin the present review. If this species actually forms, it is not clear why it would nothave been detected in previous potentiometric studies.A value for the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> NpO + 2was reported by Sullivan, Choppin<strong>and</strong> Rao [91SUL/CHO] but, as discussed in Appendix A, the measured heat is probablynot the heat <strong>of</strong> this hydrolysis reaction. Recently, the entropy values <strong>of</strong> NpO 2 OH(aq)<strong>and</strong> NpO 2 (OH) − 2have been estimated by Lemire [84LEM] <strong>and</strong> Lemire <strong>and</strong> Garisto[89LEM/GAR]. The value Sm◦ (NpO 2OH, aq, 298.15 K) = (25 ± 60) J·K−1·mol−1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!