12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

580 A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected referencesvalue is in excellent agreement with the value E ◦′ = (0.982 ± 0.002) V determined byConnick <strong>and</strong> McVey [51CON/MCV].Also, from measurements <strong>of</strong> the redox potential as a function <strong>of</strong> the acid concentrationat an ionic strength <strong>of</strong> 1 M, the first hydrolysis constant for Pu 4+ , β 1 ,wasdetermined. No time dependence <strong>of</strong> the results was mentioned, although this mighthave been expected, particularly in the less acidic mixtures. Therefore, the uncertaintyin log ∗ 10 β 1 was estimated in the present review as ±0.2.Comments on the use <strong>of</strong> this work to determine formation constants for chlorocomplexes <strong>of</strong> Pu(IV) (<strong>and</strong> for correction for Pu(III) chloride complexes) are providedbelow in the discussion <strong>of</strong> the paper by Rabideau <strong>and</strong> Cowan [55RAB/COW].The authors explained the shift <strong>of</strong> the redox potential in nitrate media to more positivevalues (as compared to the value in perchlorate media) as evidence for the formation<strong>of</strong> PuNO 3+3 , <strong>and</strong> calculated the overall formation constant log 10 β 1 = (0.54 ± 0.01).The possible formation <strong>of</strong> nitrate complexes <strong>of</strong> Pu(III) <strong>and</strong> activity coefficient changeswhile substituting perchlorate ions for nitrate were neglected. Even though the changesin the medium are small, so are the changes in the potential. In the course <strong>of</strong> the presentreview an attempt was made to account for the measured potential changes consideringonly activity coefficient changes. The potential differences can be expressed as alinear function <strong>of</strong> the nitrate concentration with slope 59.2 ε mV·mol −1 . In spite <strong>of</strong>a very good fit, a very large interaction coefficient difference (ε = 1.39 kg·mol −1 )was obtained. This may partly be the result <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> mixing terms in theε value in addition to contributions from complexation. More data would be neededto separate the two effects, <strong>and</strong> no recalculated value <strong>of</strong> the constant could be obtainedfrom these data.[52COH/HIN]a) NpO 2+2 /NpO+ 2 systemCohen <strong>and</strong> Hindman determined the potential in 1.027 molal HClO 4 at 25 ◦ CforthereactionNpO 2+2+ 1 2 H 2(g) Å NpO + 2 + H+as E ◦′ = (1.1373 ± 0.0008) V (for comments see [61SUL/HIN]). From potentialmeasurements as a function <strong>of</strong> the <strong>neptunium</strong> concentration, they estimated the junctionpotential <strong>of</strong> their cell to 0.0002 V. The investigators did, however, not consider thisin further correction because it was relatively small compared to the uncertainty in theredox potential. From potential measurements at 15 ◦ C <strong>and</strong> at 35 ◦ C, two isothermaltemperature coefficients (dE/dT ) isotherm = −0.00030 <strong>and</strong> −0.00023 V·K −1 were determined.This yields an average value (dE/dT )=−(0.00027 ± 0.00005) V ·K −1 .UsingE ◦′ <strong>and</strong> this value, this review determines r S m =−(26.1 ± 4.8) J·K −1·mol −1 , r G m =−(109.73 ± 0.08) kJ·mol −1 ,<strong>and</strong> r H m =−(117.5 ± 1.4) kJ·mol −1 for theabove noted reaction at st<strong>and</strong>ard temperature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!