12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references 707For the reaction:NpO + 2 + HPO2− 4Å NpO 2 HPO − 4(A.61)the authors reported log 10 β 1 (A.61, 0.1 M NaClO 4 ) = (3.11 ± 0.19) at 10 ◦ C,(2.36 ± 0.42) at 25 ◦ C <strong>and</strong> (2.06 ± 0.39) at 35 ◦ C. From the temperature variation<strong>of</strong> the complexation constant the authors also reported the thermodynamicquantities r H m (A.61, 0.1 M NaClO 4 , 298.15 K) = −69.9 kJ·mol −1 <strong>and</strong> r S m (A.61, 0.1MNaClO 4 , 298.15 K) =−188 J·K −1·mol−1 .There was no information provided about the recalculation <strong>of</strong> the constants <strong>of</strong> phosphoricacid at the given ionic strength <strong>and</strong> temperature, <strong>and</strong> no total phosphate concentrationswere reported. A recalculation performed in which the total phosphate wasfirst calculated from the reported HPO − 4concentrations, the pH <strong>and</strong> the thermodynamicconstants <strong>of</strong> phosphoric acid resulted in essentially no variation in the values <strong>of</strong>the constants for 10 <strong>and</strong> 25 ◦ C, while at 35 ◦ C no such calculations could be performed.This is because from the values in the last column <strong>of</strong> Table 3 <strong>of</strong> [84REE/DAN], a D 0value that varies between 7.7 <strong>and</strong> 9.2 has been used at 35 ◦ C, while a constant value <strong>of</strong>11.52 was used at the two other temperatures.A weighted linear regression <strong>of</strong> ln β 1 vs. 1/T (K −1 ) for the measurements at 10<strong>and</strong> 25 ◦ C, using the auxiliary values for HPO 2−4from Table 5.1 <strong>of</strong> the present review,results in r H m (A.61, 0.1 MNaClO 4 , 298.15 K) =−(52 ± 50) kJ·mol −1 <strong>and</strong> r S m (A.61, 0.1MNaClO 4 , 298.15 K) =−(127 ± 167) J·K −1·mol−1 .The recalculated value <strong>of</strong> this complexation constant at 25 ◦ C, log 10 β(A.61,0.1 MNaClO 4 ) = (2.42 ± 0.42) is used in the selection <strong>of</strong> a final value for theconstant. Extrapolation <strong>of</strong> the value to I = 0 with the SIT equations <strong>and</strong> interactioncoefficients in Appendix B (in fact the interaction coefficient term at this low ionicstrength is very small, since also ε (NpO+2 ,ClO− 4 ) = 0.25 kg·mol −1 ,(TableB.3) <strong>and</strong>ε (Na + ,HPO 2−4 ) = −0.30 kg·mol −1 (Table B.5) <strong>and</strong> the interaction coefficient <strong>of</strong> thesingle charged complex is small) results in:log 10 β ◦ (A.61, I = 0, 298.15 K) = (2.86 ± 0.45)[84VAR/BEG]The authors reported quasi-reversible formal potentials for the Pu(VI)/Pu(V) <strong>and</strong> theNp(VI)/Np(V) couples in 2 M Na 2 CO 3 :0.11V<strong>and</strong>0.23Vvs SCE, respectively.The authors did not make an assessment <strong>of</strong> uncertainties associated with their measurements(assumed to be ±0.01 V in this review). Also, the possibility <strong>of</strong> systematic errorsassociated with non-negligible junction potentials was not discussed or evaluated.The reported values are given no weight in the determination <strong>of</strong> the stability constants<strong>of</strong> <strong>neptunium</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>plutonium</strong> carbonate complexes. The experimental work on the <strong>neptunium</strong>system described in this report was also discussed in a paper [84VAR/HOB].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!