12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

666 A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected referencesconstants or discuss possible correlation. In the present review, the reported value forthe LiClO 4 medium has been used with the specific ion interaction theory coefficientsε (Np 4+ , ClO − 4 ) = (0.84 ± 0.06) kg·mol−1 <strong>and</strong> ε (NpOH 3+ , ClO − 4 ) = (0.50 ± 0.05) kg·mol−1(estimated) to calculate log10 ∗β◦1 = (0.56 ± 0.5). Similarly, using ε (Np(OH) 2+2 , ClO− 4 ) =(0.4 ± 0.2) kg·mol −1 (estimated), log10 ∗β◦2=−0.1 can be calculated; however, thisvalue is rejected because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> details concerning hydrolysis beyond the firstdeprotonation step.[77ERM/PER]In this study, measurements were made <strong>of</strong> the Np(VI)/Np(V) <strong>and</strong> Pu(VI)/Pu(V) couples in aqueous LiOH solutions (2.5 M to 4.0 M). The potentialswere measured relative to a mercuric oxide electrode. Using = 0.881[59ROB/STO], (a H2 O = 0.924) <strong>and</strong> the specific ion interaction theory coefficients,including the estimated values ε (NpO2 (OH) − 3 , Li+ ) = (0.05 ± 0.10) kg·mol −1 ,ε (NpO2 (OH) 2−4 , Li+ ) = −(0.05 ± 0.10) kg·mol−1 ,values<strong>of</strong>E ◦ can be calculated forthe reactions involving the most probable hydrolysis species. Assuming the Np(V)species to be NpO 2 (OH) − 2 , the potentials E◦ = 0.153 V, 0.987 V <strong>and</strong> 1.821 V forReactions (A.54), (A.55), (A.56), respectively, are calculated using the data for the2.5 M LiOH solutions.NpO 2 (OH) 2 (aq) + e − Å NpO 2 (OH) − 2(A.54)NpO 2 (OH) − 3 + e− + H + Å NpO 2 (OH) − 2 + H 2O(l) (A.55)NpO 2 (OH) 2−4+ e − + 2H + Å NpO 2 (OH) − 2 + 2H 2O(l) (A.56)From these <strong>and</strong> the selected formation constant for NpO 2 (OH) − 2 ,log 10 ∗β◦2 (8.2) =−(23.6 ± 0.5), <strong>and</strong> assuming only one non-polymeric Np(VI) hydrolysis speciesin the hydroxide solutions, the calculated possible hydrolysis constants for NpO 2+2are ∗ β2 ◦ = 10−6.6 , ∗ β3 ◦ = 10−(20.7±1.7) or ∗ β4 ◦ = 10−(34.8±1.7) . The value for ∗ β2◦is not consistent with the hydrolysis constants measured in acidic solutions, <strong>and</strong>it is concluded in this review that NpO 2 (OH) 2 (aq) is not the predominant Np(VI)hydrolysis species in highly alkaline solutions. The latter two constants are similar tothe values selected for the corresponding uranium species [92GRE/FUG].The measured potentials do not vary significantly with changing hydroxide concentration,but the hydroxide concentrations <strong>and</strong> ionic strengths are correlated. Therefore,it is not possible to distinguish between the hydrogen ion dependence <strong>of</strong> the potentials<strong>and</strong> activity effects.[77SAI/UEN]Np(IV), (V) <strong>and</strong> (VI) were precipitated in 0.05 to 0.8 M Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solutions usingthe hexamminecobalt(III) cation. The composition <strong>of</strong> the solid phase (or phases ?)were deduced from <strong>chemical</strong> analysis. Absorption spectra were shown for aqueoussolutions containing <strong>neptunium</strong> in each valence state.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!