12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

396 19. Plutonium group 16 compounds <strong>and</strong> complexesTable 19.3: (continued)Reference log 10 ∗ β I m log 10 ∗ β ◦ t( ◦ C)[76BAG/RAM2] (4.59±0.11) 2.2 (HClO 4 ) (7.32±0.21) 25(4.45±0.11) 2.2 (HClO 4 ) (7.18±0.21) 25[77BAG/RAM] (4.58±0.01) (a) 2.2 (HClO 4 ) 10(4.38±0.05) (a) 2.2 (HClO 4 ) 10[83NAS/CLE] (4.10±0.09) (a) 2.2 (H,Na)ClO 4 0(4.06±0.07) (a) 2.2 (H,Na)ClO 4 10(4.13±0.07) 2.2 (H,Na)ClO 4 (6.86±0.19) 25(4.11±0.08) (a) 2.2 (H,Na)ClO 4 35Best Value (4.43±0.01) 2.2 (7.18±0.32) 25(a) Used to calculate r H ◦ m only.The most reliable value <strong>of</strong> log ∗ 10 β ◦ (I)(19.5) atI = 2.2 m is the weighted average<strong>of</strong> the results at 25 ◦ C reported in Table 19.3: (4.43 ± 0.01). Based on theionic interaction parameters determined for the analogous U(IV) complex (ε(19.5) =−(0.46 ± 0.08) kg·mol −1 ;[92GRE/FUG]), this value can be extrapolated to st<strong>and</strong>ardstate: log10 ∗β◦∗2(19.5) = (7.18 ± 0.32). Caution is advised in the use <strong>of</strong> log10 β◦ 2 (19.5)outside <strong>of</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> H + concentration (1-2 M) in which it was determined. Thereare four independent sets <strong>of</strong> equilibrium constants determined in identical experimentsover a range <strong>of</strong> temperatures from which to estimate r Hm ◦ (19.4) <strong>and</strong> rHm ◦ (19.5):[73PAT/RAM] (including results <strong>of</strong> [76PAT/RAM]), two from [77BAG/RAM] (includingthe results <strong>of</strong> [76BAG/RAM] <strong>and</strong>[76BAG/RAM2]), <strong>and</strong> [83NAS/CLE]. The fourdeterminations yield r Hm ◦ (19.4) =−(7.1±1.7), (2.4±3.5), (7.2±3.0), <strong>and</strong> (18.6±1.2) kJ·mol −1 <strong>and</strong> r Hm ◦ (19.5) = (3.1 ± 1.8), (8.6 ± 1.4), (7.5 ± 2.3), <strong>and</strong> (1.5 ±3.4) kJ·mol −1 . The unweighted average <strong>of</strong> these results is indistinguishable from 0( r Hm ◦ (19.4) = (5.3 ± 21.3) kJ·mol−1 <strong>and</strong> r Hm ◦ (19.5) = (5.2 ± 6.8) kJ·mol−1 ).Aswe have no basis to eliminate any <strong>of</strong> these experimental results, we recommend no bestvalue, <strong>and</strong> advise caution in the determination <strong>of</strong> fundamental thermodynamic propertiesfrom the temperature variation <strong>of</strong> log ∗10 β 1(19.4) <strong>and</strong> log ∗10 β 2(19.5) in this system.19.1.1.1.d Pu(III) sulphatesThere are four experimental data sets concerning the Pu(III)-sulphate system(Table 19.4). Although Pu(III)-bisulphate complexes have been postulated(Pu(HSO 4 ) + 2 ,<strong>and</strong>Pu(SO 4)(HSO 4 )(aq); [67NAI/RAO], [83NAS/CLE2]), the resultsare interpreted by this review as consistent with the equilibria:Pu 3+ + HSO − 4Å PuSO + 4 + H+ (19.6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!