12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.1 Neptunium carbon compounds <strong>and</strong> complexes 223are then deduced for the equilibriaNaNpO 2 CO 3·xH 2 O(s) Å Na + + NpO + 2 + CO2− 3+ xH 2 O (12.11)NpO + 2 + iCO2− 3Å NpO 2 (CO 3 )i 1−2i(12.12)As discussed below <strong>and</strong> in Appendix A (see the discussions <strong>of</strong> [84VIT,90RIG, 93LEM/BOY]) well-characterised hydrated solid phases are difficultto obtain. These solids may evolve during the course <strong>of</strong> the equilibrations,<strong>and</strong>, at least for conditions under which NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 5−3is formed, the hydratedMNpO 2 CO 3 (s) solids are metastable with respect to others with stoichiometriessuch as M 3 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 (s) [95NEC/RUN]. When enough experimentalinformation is available [84VIT, 93LEM/BOY, 98VIT/CAP] these changescan be recognized, <strong>and</strong> are consistent with published X-ray diffraction patterns[94MEI, 95NEC/RUN, 96RUN/NEU, 98VIT/CAP]; these transformations couldcause problems even within the same set <strong>of</strong> measurements by the same author. Toavoid this problem, this review used another set <strong>of</strong> equilibria to interpret solubilitymeasurements. One equilibrium must correspond to the solubility product (Eq. 12.10,i = 0), <strong>and</strong> its determination is not independent <strong>of</strong> these kinetic problems, but theother equilibriaNpO 2 (CO 3 ) 3−2ii−1+ CO2− 3Å NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 1−2ii(12.13)corresponding to the stepwise complexation constants, K i = β i /β i−1 = K s,i (12.10)/K s,i−1 (12.10), are less dependent on the solid phase problem. These stepwise constantswere also directly measured when using absorption spectrophotometry or liquid-liquidextraction techniques.Several papers have recently appeared [94NEC/RUN, 95FAN/NEC, 95NEC/FAN,95NOV/ROB, 95NEC/RUN, 96RUN/NEU] proposing <strong>and</strong> comparing extrapolationsto zero ionic strength using the SIT (Appendix B) <strong>and</strong> the equations <strong>of</strong> Pitzer [73PIT].As discussed below <strong>and</strong> in Appendix A references to these papers, the complexationconstant <strong>and</strong> solubility product values as extrapolated to zero ionic strength are in reasonableagreement with those based on other publications. However, some <strong>of</strong> theseresults lead to inconsistencies in the derived SIT parameters (cf. Section 12.1.2.1.3.b).The differences may indicate experimental problems in some <strong>of</strong> these studies, or some<strong>of</strong> the earlier studies, or theoretical problems related to neglect <strong>of</strong> anion-anion interactions,or might result in part from some <strong>of</strong> the fitted parameters being highly correlated.As discussed below small systematic deviations could not be ruled out for all theexperimental measurements used in the present review to select thermodynamic datafor the Np(V) carbonate system. To minimize the effect <strong>of</strong> these systematic deviations,this review selected procedures that enhanced cancellation <strong>of</strong> errors, reduced the errorsas much as possible, or corrected them when feasible; similar weight was given to dataoriginated from each laboratory because duplicating experiments decreases the r<strong>and</strong>omuncertainties, but not the systematic errors. A better treatment <strong>of</strong> the r<strong>and</strong>om uncertaintiesis generally obtained by equally weighting the values from each laboratory to selecta given constant.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!