12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220 12. Neptunium group 14 compounds <strong>and</strong> complexesIn the present review, the influence <strong>of</strong> the ionic strength on the values was confirmedas being negligible from a calculation using the data at the end <strong>of</strong> the titration wherethe limiting complex had already formed, <strong>and</strong> only the ionic strength was being varied(Appendix A). The uncertainty was increased to the same value previously estimatedfor the uranium system [92GRE/FUG] r Hm ◦ (12.2, 298.15 K) = −(41.9 ± 4.1) kJ·mol−1From this value, f Hm ◦ (NpO2+ 2 , 298.15 K) =−(860.7 ± 4.7) kJ·mol−1 (Section7.2)<strong>and</strong> f Hm ◦ (CO2− 3 , 298.15 K) =−(675.23 ± 0.25) kJ·mol−1 (Table 5.1) f Hm ◦ (NpO 2(CO 3 ) 4−3, 298.15 K) =−(2928.32 ± 6.25) kJ·mol−1is calculated. From r Hm ◦ (12.2, 298.15 K) = −(41.9 ± 4.1) kJ·mol−1 <strong>and</strong> r G ◦ m (12.2, 298.15 K) = −(110.57 ± 1.09) kJ·mol−1 selected above in thissection, r Sm ◦ (12.2, 298.15 K) = (230.32 ± 14.23) J·K−1·mol−1 is calculated.This value is (51.73 ± 19.80) J·K −1·mol−1 less than the corresponding uraniumvalue (282.05 ± 13.79) J·K −1·mol−1 [92GRE/FUG]. r Sm ◦ (12.2, 298.15) =(230.32 ± 14.23) J·K −1·mol−1 , Sm ◦ (NpO2+ 2, aq, 298.15) = −(92.4 ± 10.5)J·K −1·mol−1 (Section 7.3) <strong>and</strong>Sm ◦ (CO2− 3, aq, 298.15 K) =−(50 ± 1) J·K−1·mol−1(Table 5.1)giveSm ◦ (NpO 2(CO 3 ) 4−−13, aq, 298.15 K) =−(12.07 ± 17.92) J·K−1·molwhich is (46.0 ± 23) J·K−1·mol−1less than the corresponding uranium valueSm ◦ (UO 2(CO 3 ) 4−3 , aq, 298.15 K) = (33.9 ± 14.4) J·K−1·mol−1 [92GRE/FUG].12.1.2.1.2.f DiscussionThe values selected in this review (see Table 12.3) for the Np(VI) carbonate complexes(<strong>and</strong> compound, see below) are quite similar to those for the corresponding uranium<strong>and</strong> <strong>plutonium</strong> species. Small regular variations are usually observed in the U, Np,Pu series. However, these can lead to real differences in behaviour <strong>of</strong> the species insolution as discussed above for the stability <strong>of</strong> the carbonate trinuclear complexes.12.1.2.1.3 Np(V) carbonate <strong>and</strong> mixed hydroxide-carbonate complexesAs part <strong>of</strong> their study <strong>of</strong> potassium dioxo<strong>neptunium</strong>(V) carbonate solids Gorbenko-Germanov <strong>and</strong> Zenkova [66GOR/ZEN] published absorption spectra <strong>of</strong> their aqueoussolutions. The spectra were later confirmed [75UEN/SAI] <strong>and</strong> can be interpretedas primarily resulting from the limiting complex NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 5−3[90RIG]. Simakin[77SIM] deduced the correct stoichiometry <strong>of</strong> this limiting Np(V) carbonate complex,from solubility measurements <strong>of</strong> a hydrated Na 3 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 (s) compound at constantionic strength (3 M NaNO 3 ) in concentrated carbonate aqueous solutions. The fulldemonstration <strong>of</strong> this stoichiometry was only confirmed later (see Appendix A discussionsfor [77SIM, 90RIG]). Simakin’s measurements were the first reliable work on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!