12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references 743Table A.20: Curve fitting results <strong>of</strong> solubility measurements <strong>of</strong> Np(V)in 3 M NaClO 4 carbonate/bicarbonate/carbonic acid aqueous solutions[84VIT, 85CÔM, 85KIM, 86GRE/ROB, 90RIG] (a) . K s,j =[Na + ] (2j−1) [NpO + 2 ][CO2− 3 ]j is the Na (2j−1) NpO 2 (CO 3 ) j (s) solubility product.β i =[NpO 2 (CO 3 ) (1−2i)i]/([NpO + 2 ][CO2−3 ]i ).log 10 K s,1 log 10 K s,2 log 10 β 1 log 10 β 2 log 10 β 3 1.96 Reference−10.92 4.60 8.12 10.44 [84VIT]4.12 8.60 10.76 [84VIT] (b)−10.50 −16.40 4.60 8.12 10.44 [85CÔM]−10.56 −12.44 5.09 8.15 10.46 0.269 [86GRE/ROB] (c)±0.34 ±0.57 ±0.43 ±0.38−10.63 5.33 8.13 10.56 0.114 best fit±0.38 ±0.51 ±0.84 ±0.41−10.65 5.25 8.15 10.64 0.250 this review±0.33 ±0.29 ±0.46 ±0.37(a) All values were calculated from the same set <strong>of</strong> experimental measurements, except thosefrom Vitorge [84VIT] that used preliminary results. Minimum solubility values were used todetermine K s,1 <strong>and</strong> not the best fit obtained by minimising 2 (<strong>of</strong> K s,1 <strong>and</strong> K s,1 β i ), the leastsquare sum. Uncertainties (calculated in the present review) are 1.96 st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations basedon a weighted mean <strong>of</strong> the corresponding equilibrium constant.(b) Assuming the formation <strong>of</strong> Na 0.72 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 0.86 (s) solid phase.(c) Uncertainties calculated in the present review; the values were also reported elsewhere[85KIM, 90RIG].NaNpO 2 CO 3 (s). This is consistent with the X-ray diffraction results <strong>and</strong> with theseries <strong>of</strong> observations by Volkov et al. (see the discussion <strong>of</strong> [84VIT] in this appendix).Thermodynamic (solubility product) data for these non-stoichiometric solids are notaccepted in this review. If a stable Na (2x−1) NpO 2 (CO 3 ) x (s) solid phase with x < 1isformed, it would be transformed into a hydrated NaNpO 2 CO 3 (s) phase when the freecarbonate concentration is increased. One would then expect a correlation betweenthe error ([Np] measured −[Np] calculated )<strong>and</strong>[CO 2−3] which was not detected in dataanalysed in the present review. This confirmed that the scatter <strong>of</strong> the data was due tokinetic problems (slow crystallisation <strong>and</strong> possible variation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> watermolecules in the hydrated solid [93LEM/BOY]), <strong>and</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> the ion exchangeequilibrium in the solid phase, if any, was less important.At higher carbonate concentrations for which batch experiments were used, fourweeks were needed to achieve equilibrium (two weeks were insufficient). This indicatesthat probably all the other previously published values based on the solubility <strong>of</strong>hydrated NaNpO 2 CO 3 (s) at room temperature are based on experiments that had notreached equilibrium; this kinetic problem has not usually been mentioned. In 0.1 Mcarbonate (I = 3MNaClO 4 ) solution, the expected solubility was greater than wasmeasured. This was evidence <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> a new solid phase. The authorsidentified a hydrated Na 3 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 2 (s) solid phase by its X-ray diffraction pattern.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!