12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references 703The <strong>chemical</strong> conditions for some <strong>of</strong> the measurements <strong>of</strong> the potential <strong>of</strong> theNp(VI)/Np(V) couple were similar to those <strong>of</strong> the potentiometric titrations. Nevertheless,the results cannot be plotted on a single curve as a function <strong>of</strong> [CO 2−3]. As thetotal concentration <strong>of</strong> Np(VI) was approximately three orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude greater inthe titration experiments, the two sets <strong>of</strong> experiments, taken together, provide evidence<strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> at least one polymeric Np(VI) complex containing hydroxide anions.Curve-fitting indicates that none <strong>of</strong> the known hydroxide Np(VI) complexes can beidentified as the intermediate complex(es). Thus, this work provides the first (<strong>and</strong> essentiallythe only) experimental evidence <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> (at least) one polymericNp(VI)-OH complex that also contains carbonate as a lig<strong>and</strong>.The author fitted the overall formation constants, β a,b,x for the equilibria aNpO 2+2 +bCO 2 (g) + (b + x)H 2 O Å (NpO 2 ) a (CO 3 ) b (OH) x2a−2b−x + (2b + x)H + which (asexplained above) refer to the free species, NpO 2+2. This is always a minor species[98VIT/CAP], <strong>and</strong> the complexation reactions involving this species are probably notdirectly measurable. For this reason the equilibrium constants (βa,b,x ′ = β a,b,x/β1,3,0 a )for the dissociation <strong>of</strong> the limiting complex aNpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3+ (b − 3a)CO 2 (g) +(b + x − 3a)H 2 O Å (NpO 2 ) a (CO 3 ) b (OH) 2a−2b−xx +(2b + x − 6a)H + should be used.Graphical analysis [98VIT/CAP] indicates that many possible complexes couldform on hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3at lower partial pressures <strong>of</strong> CO 2 (g). Among others,these include the species (NpO 2 ) 2 CO 3 (OH) − 3 , (NpO 2) 3 (OH) − 7 or (NpO 2) 3 (OH) 2−8(analogous to species proposed for uranium [92GRE/FUG, 95PAL/NGU]). Curvefittingresults (many different approaches have been used [98VIT/CAP] in preparingthis section <strong>of</strong> the present review) lead to similar conclusions if we accept not only thebest fit but also those that are within reasonable confidence limits (±1.96 σ min )<strong>of</strong>the“best fit” set. The fit proposed by Maya is only one among the many possible that givequite reasonable results. The values calculated for the formation constants for several<strong>of</strong> the more likely species are highly correlated. This review accepts the numbers heproposed; but only as possible maximum values, <strong>and</strong> then only for the equilibria correspondingto βa,b,x ′ <strong>and</strong> not β a,b,x (NpO 2+2was always a minor species). To limitthe discussion, this review considered only the species analogous to those proposedin the TDB uranium review [92GRE/FUG] or those suggested recently by Palmer <strong>and</strong>Nguyen-Trung [95PAL/NGU]).There is evidence [86GRE/RIG, 90RIG] that for conditions similar to those used byMaya, (NpO 2 ) 3 (CO 3 ) 6−6, could not be neglected [98VIT/CAP] in the buffering regionduring the titrations at the highest carbon dioxide gas partial pressure. A formationconstant for this species is proposed, <strong>and</strong> incorporated in the other recalculations. For(NpO 2 ) 2 CO 3 (OH) − 3, the value proposed by the author is marginally consistent withlater work [86GRE/RIG, 90RIG]. By analogy with uranium, Maya’s value for theformation constant is accepted in the present review with an uncertainty <strong>of</strong> ±1.0 inlog 10 K for2NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3+ 7H + Å (NpO 2 ) 2 CO 3 (OH) − 3 + 5CO 2(g) + 2H 2 O(l)The simple dicarbonato complex, NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 2−2, was undoubtedly only a minorspecies in Maya’s solutions, <strong>and</strong> the formation constant he proposed is clearly an over-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!