12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.1 Neptunium carbon compounds <strong>and</strong> complexes 271However, as this review neared completion, a new study on Np(IV) solubilitywas used to select data from which log 10 β5(IV) ◦ (12.23) = (35.62 ± 1.07) <strong>and</strong>ε (Np(CO3 ) 6−5 ,K+ )= −(0.73 ± 0.68) mol·kg −1 were obtained (Section 12.1.2.1.4).By extrapolation <strong>of</strong> E ◦′ (12.29, 1 M K 2 CO 3 ) to zero ionic strength (assumingε (K + ,Np(CO 3 ) 3−3 ) = ε (Na + ,Am(CO 3 ) 3− )) 3E ◦ (12.30, 298.15 K) =−(0.962 ± 0.134) V/SHE r G ◦ m (12.30, 298.15 K) = (92.82 ± 12.93) kJ·mol−1are calculated <strong>and</strong> selected. From the latter, f G ◦ m (Np(CO 3) 6−5, 298.15 K) (Section12.1.2.1.4) <strong>and</strong> f G ◦ m (CO2− 3, 298.15 K) (Table 5.1) f G ◦ m (Np(CO 3) 3−3, 298.15 K) =−(2185.95 ± 15.45) kJ·mol−1Then using values <strong>of</strong> E ◦ (12.30) <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard potential <strong>of</strong> the Np 4+ /Np 3+redox couple E ◦ (7.9) as selected in this review (Section 7.5), log 10 (β5(IV) ◦ (12.23)/β3(III) ◦ (12.31, M = Np)) = (19.96 ± 2.27) <strong>and</strong> log 10 β◦ 3(12.31, M = Np) =(15.66 ± 2.51) are calculated. The corresponding values for the americium system[95SIL/BID] are (20.1 ± 0.9) <strong>and</strong> (15.2 ± 0.6), respectively.12.1.2.2 Solid <strong>neptunium</strong> carbonates12.1.2.2.1 Solid <strong>neptunium</strong>(VI) carbonatesThere have been several publications on <strong>neptunium</strong>(VI) solubility in carbonate/bicarbonateaqueous solutions. The available experimental information issummarised in Table 12.1, where the results <strong>of</strong> reanalysis <strong>of</strong> data carried out in thepresent review are also provided.In this review the solubility measurements <strong>of</strong> Gorbenko-Germanov <strong>and</strong> Klimov[66GOR/KLI] have been interpreted, <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> Moskvin [71MOS2] have been reinterpreted(see Table 12.1), as discussed by Vitorge <strong>and</strong> Capdevila [98VIT/CAP] consideringthe following equilibria:(NH 4 ) 4 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (s) Å NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3+ 4NH + 4(12.32)K 4 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (s) Å NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3+ 4K + (12.33)This was done even though the solid phase K 4 NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (s) was not properlycharacterized. The corresponding equilibrium constants (Table 12.1) were extrapolatedto zero ionic strength (see Appendix A) by performing linear SIT regressions with ε(12.32), −(0.70±0.14) kg·mol −1 <strong>and</strong> ε (12.33) −(0.54±0.37) kg·mol −1 from whichε (NpO2 (CO 3 ) 4−3 ,NH+ 4 ) = −(0.78 ± 0.25) kg·mol −1ε (NpO2 (CO 3 ) 4−3 ,K+ )= −(0.62 ± 0.42) kg·mol −1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!