12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

718 A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected referencesaccording to our calculations). It is certainly correct to interpret the potential difference,measured with Method A in the presence <strong>and</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> Np(V), in terms <strong>of</strong>the formation <strong>of</strong> NpO 2 F(aq). However, the reliability <strong>of</strong> the resulting constants cannotbe high. These values can only be given a small weight in the selection procedure<strong>of</strong> the present review. We use log 10 β 1 (A.62, I = 0.1 M) = (1.51 ± 0.50) <strong>and</strong>log 10 β 1 (A.62, I = 1M) = (1.15 ± 0.80).[85SCH/FRI]This work reports the results <strong>of</strong> calorimetric titrations <strong>of</strong> uranium(VI) <strong>and</strong> <strong>neptunium</strong>(VI)in aqueous Na 2 SO 4 solutions with Na 2 CO 3 <strong>and</strong> (for uranium(VI)) NaHCO 3aqueous solutions at 25 ◦ C. The uranium experiments were done at I = 1.6 Musingsamples containing 50 µmoles <strong>of</strong> U(VI), <strong>and</strong> similar conditions were used for the<strong>neptunium</strong> experiments. The uranium part <strong>of</strong> this work has already been discussed inthe NEA uranium review [92GRE/FUG], <strong>and</strong> the same reinterpretation is used in thepresent review.The authors [85SCH/FRI] reported enthalpy changes forUO 2+2+ 2CO 2−3Å UO 2 (CO 3 ) 2−2<strong>and</strong> for M = U <strong>and</strong> NpMO 2+2+ 3CO 2−3Å MO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3Grenthe et al. [92GRE/FUG] concluded that the technical quality <strong>of</strong> the enthalpy dataseem to be satisfactory, but they found that the two main reactions taking place underthe conditions <strong>of</strong> experiment areUO 2 SO 4 (aq) + 2CO 2−3Å 1 3 (UO 2) 3 (CO 3 ) 6−6+ SO 2−4UO 2 SO 4 (aq) + 3CO 2−3Å UO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3+ SO 2−4.The authors gave a value <strong>of</strong> the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> the reaction r H m (I = 0.3to1.6MNa 2 SO 4 ) = −(50 ± 2) kJ·mol −1A re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> the three experimental determinations at high excess CO 2−3concentrationsyields a more realistic estimate <strong>of</strong> r H m =−(50.1 ± 12.2) kJ·mol −1 .Assuming that NpO 2 SO 4 (aq) is the only species initially present in the calorimeter, r H m (10.1) =−(16.7 ± 0.5) kJ·mol −1 can be used to estimate r H m for the reactionNpO 2+2+ 3CO 2−3Å NpO 2 (CO 3 ) 4−3(A.63) r H m (A.63) = −(33.4 ± 12.2) kJ·mol −1consistent with the subsequent determinations made by Ullman <strong>and</strong> Schreiner[88ULL/SCH] using the same calorimeter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!