12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references 777result from several causes: including the small systematic errors noted in this appendix,incorrect theoretical methodology (i.e., problems with the SIT or the currently acceptedε values), <strong>chemical</strong> problems with the solid phases or other experimental difficulties.[94RIZ/RAO]The paper presents results <strong>of</strong> a calorimetric study at 25 ◦ C <strong>of</strong> the titration <strong>of</strong> 242 Pu(VI)in initially acidic aqueous solution with CO 2−3-free NaOH. It provides estimates <strong>of</strong>the enthalpies <strong>of</strong> hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> PuO 2+2to form the monohydroxydioxo<strong>plutonium</strong>(VI)( r H m = (28.0 ± 5.0) kJ·mol −1 ) <strong>and</strong> the dihydroxydioxo<strong>plutonium</strong>(VI) complexes( r H m = (42.6 ± 7.0) kJ·mol −1 ).PuO 2+2+ aH 2 O(l) Å PuO 2 (OH) (2−a)+a (aq) + aH + (A.76)The raw data are not available for recalculation, <strong>and</strong> this is unfortunate because thepartition <strong>of</strong> the enthalpy change between the reactions to form different hydrolysisspecies is dependent on the selected hydrolysis constants, or at least on their relativevalues. The hydrolysis constant values actually used were from Pashalidis et al.[93PAS/KIM2]. Recalculation as discussed in Appendix A <strong>of</strong> the present review, suggestsonly slightly different values, log10 ∗β11 =−5.14 <strong>and</strong> log10 ∗β12 =−10.03in1MNaClO 4 at 20 ◦ C, but these (particularly ∗ β 12 )maybeinerror[95PAS/KIM]. However,if the entropies <strong>of</strong> reaction as reported are correct, it appears that regardless <strong>of</strong>other problems, the log ∗10 β 1i values can be considered to be independent <strong>of</strong> temperaturebetween 20 <strong>and</strong> 25 ◦ C. If the results from Pashalidis et al. [95PAS/KIM] are considered,it would appear the enthalpy changes observed by Rizkalla et al. should beattributed to the first hydrolysis reaction, <strong>and</strong> (probably) to some undesired polymerisationreaction(s), at least for the pH ranges shown in Table 2. The suggested value <strong>of</strong>28 kJ·mol −1 is accepted here for the first hydrolysis step, but with the uncertainty increasedto ±15 kJ·mol −1 . It is not clear which hydrolysis reaction should be properlyassociated with the second enthalpy, <strong>and</strong> it is not accepted in the present review.[94VEI/SMI]This is a qualitative study <strong>of</strong> Pu(IV) nitrate complexation using a variety <strong>of</strong> spectroscopicmethods at an unspecified temperature <strong>and</strong> at 2.34 molal ionic strength, probablyperchloric acid (this is not clearly stated, if the total molar concentration wasconstant, the molality changes in the mixtures). The major finding from the absorptionspectroscopy measurements is the presence <strong>of</strong> two near-isobestic points at 471.2 <strong>and</strong>472.3 nm. This is interpreted as pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> three species, that is, theaqueous ion <strong>and</strong> its two complexes with one <strong>and</strong> two nitrates. Furthermore, the twonitrate complexes have identical maximum molar absorptivity at 476 nm. This reviewdoes not consider the observed effect as sufficient pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> the dinitratecomplex. Preliminary EXAFS measurements were also been reported, but a morecomplete discussion was carried out in [96ALL/VEI].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!