12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

788 A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected referencesculated assuming equilibrium with the air (again no pH measurement was provided),from which log 10 β 5(IV) (1.0MNa 2 CO 3 , A.78) = (38.98 ± 1.97) is calculated.c) Temperature influence on the formal potential <strong>of</strong> the Np(V)/Np(IV) redoxcouple in carbonate mediaThe main source <strong>of</strong> uncertainty (lack <strong>of</strong> pH measurement) cancels in the study<strong>of</strong> the temperature dependence <strong>of</strong> the potential measured for a single solution.The potentials measured in each solution varied linearly as a function <strong>of</strong> temperature,<strong>and</strong> these changes were reproducible within less than 10 mV. Fromlinear regression, the authors calculated temperature coefficient values <strong>of</strong> -2.058,-2.168 <strong>and</strong> -2.241 mV·K −1 for the 0.6, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 1.5 M Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solutions,respectively. If the heat capacity <strong>of</strong> reaction is assumed to be negligible, thesetemperature coefficients can be used to calculate r H(A.77) = -82.40, -85.86 <strong>and</strong>-89.91 kJ·mol −1 in 0.6, 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 1.5 M Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solutions, respectively.From linear regression <strong>of</strong> ( r H(A.77) − 11z 2 T 2 (∂ε/∂T)Rln10)vs.m Na +, thereviewer calculated r H(A.77) =−(84.39 ± 4.38) kJ·mol −1 <strong>and</strong> T ◦ (∂ε/∂T)(A.77)=−(0.50 ± 0.34)kg·mol −1 (values <strong>of</strong> (∂D/∂T) were calculated from the Debye HückelA <strong>and</strong> B values given in Appendix B assuming no variation <strong>of</strong> a j with T, <strong>and</strong> that Ba j=1.5at25 ◦ C). This value <strong>of</strong> r H(A.77) is virtually the same as the mean <strong>of</strong> the threevalues for the different media, -(85.06 ± 4.63) kJ·mol −1 .d) Dissociation <strong>of</strong> the Np(IV) limiting complex in bicarbonate mediaTo study the dissociation <strong>of</strong> the Np(IV) carbonate limiting complex, Np(IV) was preparedas above by electrolysing 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 <strong>and</strong> 1.5 M Na 2 CO 3 aqueous solutions<strong>of</strong> Np(V). Carbon dioxide gas, preequilibrated with NaCl solutions <strong>of</strong> the sameionic strength, was then bubbled through these carbonate solutions. During these titrations,pH was measured <strong>and</strong> spectra were recorded from 600 to 1100 nm. No spectralchange was observed in the 1.5 M Na 2 CO 3 solution from pH 12.64 to 10.34, althoughprecipitation (attributed to NaHCO 3 (s) formation) was observed. The authors interpretedtheir experimental observations, including molar absorbances at 823, 990 <strong>and</strong>1013 nm, in terms <strong>of</strong> dissociation <strong>of</strong> the Np(IV) limiting carbonate complex accordingto the following equilibriumNp(CO 3 ) 6−5Å Np(CO 3 ) 4−4+ CO 2−3(A.79)involving the loss <strong>of</strong> only one CO 2−3. Ionic strength varied during each titration as aresult <strong>of</strong> the reactionH 2 O + CO 2−3+ CO 2 (g) Å 2HCO − 3In their data analysis, Delmau, Vitorge <strong>and</strong> Capdevila used the data atthe half dissociation point for the mean at the three wavelengths. Usingthe data given page 57 <strong>of</strong> the report [96DEL/VIT], log 10 K ◦ 5 (A.79) =−(1.071 ± 0.136) <strong>and</strong> ε = (0.377 ± 0.184)kg·mol −1 are calculated. From

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!