12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3Selected <strong>neptunium</strong> dataThis chapter presents the <strong>chemical</strong> thermodynamic data set for <strong>neptunium</strong> specieswhich has been selected in this review. Table 3.1 contains the recommended thermodynamicdata <strong>of</strong> the <strong>neptunium</strong> compounds <strong>and</strong> complexes, Table 3.2 the recommendedthermodynamic data <strong>of</strong> <strong>chemical</strong> equilibrium reactions by which the <strong>neptunium</strong> compounds<strong>and</strong> complexes are formed, <strong>and</strong> Table 3.3 the temperature coefficients <strong>of</strong> theheat capacity data <strong>of</strong> Table 3.1 where available.The species <strong>and</strong> reactions in Tables 3.1, 3.2 <strong>and</strong> 3.3 appear in st<strong>and</strong>ard order <strong>of</strong>arrangement (cf. Figure 2.1). Table 3.2 contains information only on those reactions forwhich primary data selections are made in this review. These selected reaction data areused, together with data for key <strong>neptunium</strong> species (for example Np 4+ ) <strong>and</strong> auxiliarydata listed in Table 5.1, to derive the corresponding formation quantities in Table 3.1.The uncertainties associated with values for the key <strong>neptunium</strong> species <strong>and</strong> for some<strong>of</strong> the auxiliary data are substantial, leading to comparatively large uncertainties in theformation quantities derived in this manner.However, then the fact remains that for many reactions uncertainties in quantitiessuch as r G ◦ m are known more accurately than would be calculated directly from theuncertainties <strong>of</strong> the f G ◦ m values for species listed in Table 3.1 <strong>and</strong> the auxiliary datain Table 5.1. The uncertainties in, for example, the value <strong>of</strong> f G ◦ m (NpO 2SO − 4 ) incorporatesnot only the uncertainty in r G ◦ m for the complexation reaction from which itis derived,NpO + 2 + SO2− 4Å NpO 2 SO − 4but also the uncertainties in f G ◦ m (NpO+ 2 , aq, 298.15 K) <strong>and</strong> fG ◦ m (SO2− 4 , aq,298.15 K). Thus, back-calculation from the uncertainties <strong>of</strong> the separate speciesoverestimates the uncertainty in the Gibbs energy <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>and</strong> the uncertaintyin the corresponding equilibrium constant. The inclusion <strong>of</strong> a table for reactiondata (Table 3.2) in this report allows the use <strong>of</strong> equilibrium constants with totaluncertainties that are directly based on the experimental accuracies. This is the mainreason for including both the table for reaction data (Table 3.2) <strong>and</strong> the table <strong>of</strong> f G ◦ m , fHm ◦ , S◦ m <strong>and</strong> C◦ p,m values (Table 3.1). In a few cases, correlation <strong>of</strong> smalluncertainties in values for lig<strong>and</strong>s has been neglected in calculations <strong>of</strong> uncertaintyvalues for species in Table 3.1 from uncertainty values in Table 3.2. However, forthose species the effects are less than 2% <strong>of</strong> the stated uncertainties.Furthermore, for some reactions that involve concurrent lig<strong>and</strong> protonation or deprotonation(e.g., in certain <strong>neptunium</strong>-carbonate, -sulphate or -phosphate systems) theuncertainties in equilibrium constants are less than would have been calculated directly39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!