12.07.2015 Views

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

chemical thermodynamics of neptunium and plutonium - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Discussion <strong>of</strong> selected references 689[82MOR/FUG]This paper reports a determination <strong>of</strong> the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> Ba 2 MgNpO 6 .The enthalpy <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> MgCl 2 in 1 M HCl is calculated from the CODATA[89COX/WAG] values for Mg 2+ <strong>and</strong> Cl − <strong>and</strong> the difference (5.86 kJ·mol −1 )in the enthalpies <strong>of</strong> solution <strong>of</strong> MgCl 2 (cr) in 1 M HCl <strong>and</strong> in water reported byShin <strong>and</strong> Criss [79SHI/CRI]. The reported enthalpy <strong>of</strong> reaction <strong>of</strong> Ba 2 MgNpO 6with 1 M HCl is used with this <strong>and</strong> other auxiliary data selected in the presentreview (see Chapter 13 <strong>and</strong> the entry for [83MOR/WIL] in Appendix A) to obtain f H ◦ m (Ba 2MgNpO 6 , cr, 298.15 K) =−(3096.9 ± 8.2) kJ·mol −1 .[82NAI/CHA]Hydrolysis constants were determined by potentiometric titration (“Bjerrum-Calvin pHtitration technique”) for trivalent Pu, Am, Sm <strong>and</strong> Eu in 1 M NaClO 4 .Dataanalysisusing the method <strong>of</strong> weighted least squares was a Bjerrum type analysis (¯n functions).The calculated curves deviate systematically from the experimental points for Pu(III),but less so for Am(III), <strong>and</strong> are quite good for Sm(III) <strong>and</strong> Eu(III). Results are reportedin Table A.10.Table A.10: Hydrolysis constants for trivalent Pu, Am, Sm <strong>and</strong> Eu as given by[82NAI/CHA].Metal ion ∗ β 1 ∗ β 2 − log10 ∗β1 − log10 ∗β2Pu(III) 2.75 ± 0.16 × 10 −6 5.56 ± 0.032.85 ± 0.17 × 10 −6 5.54 ± 0.03Am(III) 9.32 ± 0.94 × 10 −8 7.03Sm(III) 1.46 ± 0.06 × 10 −9 1.85 ± 0.16 × 10 −16 8.84 15.73Eu(III) 7.59 ± 0.30 × 10 −9 3.55 ± 0.33 × 10 −16 8.12 15.45The points in Fig. 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 <strong>of</strong> [82NAI/CHA] indicate that the errors should be considerablylarger for Pu than given in the table. In the case <strong>of</strong> Pu <strong>and</strong> Am the total metalconcentrations were ≤ 0.04 mM, <strong>and</strong> polymer formation was unlikely. The approach<strong>and</strong> technique seem very good, <strong>and</strong> the results, as shown in the figures appear significant.The discrepancy between the Pu <strong>and</strong> the Am data seems too large. For Pu, thediscrepancy between the calculated curve <strong>and</strong> experimental data is substantial. Thisindicates the <strong>plutonium</strong> solution may not have been pure Pu(III), but perhaps containedsome Pu(IV). This would explain the differences. Therefore the values are rejected inthe present review.[82PER/SPI]The Np(VI)/Np(V) redox potential was found to be approximately constant inaqueous 1 to 15 M NaOH solutions. This agrees with the results <strong>of</strong> Simakin et al.[73SIM/MAT], but not with previous work <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the authors [74PER/ALE].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!