12.07.2015 Views

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Molecular Bases <strong>of</strong> the Cellular Handling <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vitamin</strong> C 219Figure 3. Schematic representation <strong>of</strong> the transporters responsible for the uptake <strong>of</strong> ascorbic acid anddehydroascorbic acid.In spite <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> differences in size and chromosomal localization, there areimportant similarities in the genomic organization <strong>of</strong> the genes encoding SVCT1 and SVCT2.Thus, SLC23A1 has a size <strong>of</strong> 16,096 bp and is localized in chromosome at 5q31.2-32.3,whereas the size <strong>of</strong> SLC23A2 is approximately ten-fold bigger (158,398 bp). Thechromosomal localization <strong>of</strong> SLC23A2 is 20p12.2-12.3. However, the size <strong>of</strong> the ORFs <strong>of</strong>both genes is similar (1,791 and 1,953 bp for SLC23A1 and SLC23A2, respectively).Moreover, both nucleotide sequences have 58% similarity (Stratakis et al., 2000; Wang et al.,2000). There is a marked analogy (86-95%) with the mRNA sequence <strong>of</strong> some SCVT1 andSVCT2 orthologues, such as those <strong>of</strong> mice, rats and guinea pigs (Daruwala et al., 1999; Clarket al., 2002).In humans, the structure <strong>of</strong> both proteins is also similar. The amino acid sequencecomprises 598 and 650 aa in the case <strong>of</strong> SVCT1 and SVCT2, respectively, with 65%similarity to each other (Daruwala et al., 1999). This level <strong>of</strong> similarity is also found in theis<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>of</strong> mice and rats (Faaland et al., 1998; Tsukaguchi et al., 1999). Regardingmolecular weight, there is some degree <strong>of</strong> controversy. Thus, in transfected cells, analysis byelectrophoresis revealed the existence <strong>of</strong> bands between 65 and 75 KDa, which probablydepends on the degree <strong>of</strong> protein glycosylation (Lutsenko et al., 2004; Kang et al., 2007),whereas in vivo, the band detected is <strong>of</strong> approximately 50 KDa (Savini et al., 2007; Savini etal., 2008).Hydropathy plot analyses predict a similar structure for both is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>of</strong> SVCTs. Theyhave 12 transmembrane domains, with both the amine and carboxyl ends locatedintracellularly. SVCT1 and SVCT2 differ in the fact that the latter contains two additionalregions <strong>of</strong> 12 and 44 aa located at positions 2 and 38, respectively (Liang et al., 2001).Regarding glycosylation sites, there are two possibilities in the extracellular loop betweentransmembrane domains 3 and 4 - Asn 138 and Asn 144 for SVCT1 and Asn 188 and Asn 196 forSVCT2 - and a third site (Asn 230 ) only for SVCT1 in the extracellular loop betweentransmembrane domains 5 and 6 (Liang et al., 2001). The glycosylation <strong>of</strong> SVCTs plays animportant role in their maturation, which determines the functionality <strong>of</strong> these transporters(Subramanian et al., 2008). Both is<strong>of</strong>orms contains several sites for potentialphosphorylation. Thus, in SVCT1 there are five sites for protein kinase C (PKC)-dependentphosphorylation and another site for PKA-dependent phosphorylation, whereas in SVCT2there are six sites for PKC-dependent phosphorylation (Daruwala et al., 1999; Wang et al.,1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!