12.07.2015 Views

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

Handbook of Vitamin C Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

270Alan M. Preston, Luis Vázquez Quiñones, Cynthia M. Pérez et al.Figure 7. <strong>Vitamin</strong> C intake per snack by smoke exposure group.Table 3. <strong>Vitamin</strong> C Intake: Summary <strong>of</strong> Food Choices and Meal Patterns <strong>of</strong> Childrenwith Low and High Exposure to ETSFood Category – <strong>Vitamin</strong> C Content Mg <strong>Vitamin</strong> C/day RatioLEX HEX LEX-HEXLow 5.6 31.4 0.2Moderate 9.9 8.6 1.2Medium 33.8 26.2 1.3High 74.1 36.2 2.1Mean Total/day 123.4 102.4Meal Category – <strong>Vitamin</strong> C ContentBreakfast 37.8 36.4 1.0Lunch 25.6 25.5 1.0Dinner 27.9 25.2 1.1Snacks 32.1 15.3 2.1Mean Total/day 123.4 102.4DiscussionAs with any research study, the method <strong>of</strong> data collection is an important consideration.In the present study, results were obtained using one 24-hour recall questionnaire per subject.This approach raises concern as to how representative is the data for a typical day. However,most large-scale nutritional surveys are conducted in this exact or similar manner, andinformation is deemed appropriate for generalizations to groups as a whole [96, 97].It should be noted that in this presentation smoke exposure is classified according to abiomarker, urinary cotinine. This is a departure from the more typical method used which isbased upon self-reported smoke exposure [70, 72-82]. We prefer using cotinine asdeterminant for the following reason. Several investigators in this area have made theobservation that self-reports are subject to errors such as poor recall or under-reported

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!