30.11.2012 Views

Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...

Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...

Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SVC Final <strong>Evaluation</strong>. Background Report Lepori and Probst<br />

8.1.13 E-Learning Services Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz<br />

General description and organisation<br />

Organisational form: a central service unit + network <strong>of</strong> local collaborators in each school <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FHNW. The CCSP will<br />

be suspended by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2007, since <strong>the</strong> FHNW direction has decided that <strong>the</strong>re will be not any more a central<br />

support structure.<br />

Website http://www.fhnw.ch/elearning<br />

Mission and strategy<br />

‘elearning services <strong>of</strong>fer information and consultancy services, <strong>the</strong>y accompany lecturers in <strong>the</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> elearning<br />

in study courses and modules. They have a good network inside <strong>the</strong> FHNW and represent its elearning concerns.’<br />

There is no overall elearning strategy at <strong>the</strong> FHNW.<br />

Activities<br />

SVC projects: 1 first call (POLE), 2 second call (H-Bridge, FE-Transfer), concluded. 3 third call (eMa<strong>the</strong>matics,<br />

Information- & IT Management online, Tricks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Trade), ongoing. Third call projects are more or less autonomous.<br />

Support and o<strong>the</strong>r activities besides SVC projects:<br />

• case studies, survey on elearning activities at <strong>the</strong> FHNW<br />

• organisation <strong>of</strong> events/courses (‘elearning Forum FHNW’) for lecturers<br />

• individual consultancy (23 in 2006)<br />

• documentation <strong>of</strong> platforms at FHNW: WebCT Vista (15 courses), Plone (80 virtual classrooms), Moodle (90 virtual<br />

classrooms), Webcorp 2 (5000 users), specific tools and s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

• website, including some best practices (mainly third round SVC projects)<br />

• collaboration and o<strong>the</strong>r contacts at a national level, conference participation<br />

Resources<br />

2006: Central support: 1 head, 2 consultants, 2 ‘coordinators didactics and ICT’ (are also lecturers). 24 collaborators at<br />

<strong>the</strong> departments (elearning responsibles, elearning assistants, IT support, lecturers, etc. – ‘knowledge managers’<br />

providing information flow and support + superusers providing services and support).<br />

Future perspectives<br />

The FHNW direction has decided at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2007 to decentralise elearning in <strong>the</strong> Departments because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir quite<br />

different requirements concerning new educational technologies. A forum for <strong>the</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> information between <strong>the</strong><br />

Departments interested in elearning will be created, while implementation <strong>of</strong> tools will be <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

informatics services. The existing CCSP will thus be closed.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> Departments, elearning seems particularly well-developed in economy in Basel, where <strong>the</strong>re is an<br />

established support team.<br />

Remarks and comments<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> CCSP will be suspended, <strong>the</strong> monitoring report for 2007 does not contain much information. The following<br />

comments <strong>the</strong>refore are based on previous information.<br />

So far, in <strong>the</strong> monitoring dossier <strong>the</strong>re is a lot about strategy papers and concepts that are being discussed or<br />

implemented. It seems that <strong>the</strong> CCSP’s strengths are mainly in conceptual development and consultancy.<br />

The CCSP does not seem to be very centralised; <strong>the</strong>y also report that platforms are hosted at different locations. It<br />

seems that it is difficult to get organisational acceptance for a centralised service; <strong>the</strong> performance report states a<br />

missing commitment by <strong>the</strong> board. However, some departments would like to have a common platform with centralised<br />

support. I have <strong>the</strong> impression that this CCSP has made <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous development without<br />

strategy, and <strong>the</strong>refore has learned that strategy is a necessary tool; <strong>the</strong>y also underline <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> a common<br />

learning culture.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!