Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...
Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...
Evaluation of the Swiss Virtual Campus - Schweizerische ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SVC Final <strong>Evaluation</strong>. Background Report Lepori and Probst<br />
N. <strong>of</strong> partners/Series 1 2 3 4 Grand Total<br />
2 2 1 1 4<br />
3 11 7 15 21 54<br />
4 9 9 10 6 34<br />
5 – 9 6 5 7 2 20<br />
Grand Total 28 22 32 30 112<br />
Table 11. Number <strong>of</strong> university partners in <strong>the</strong> SVC projects<br />
Also <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> external partners was strongly reduced. In <strong>the</strong> 1 st and 2 nd series, about half<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> projects had o<strong>the</strong>r partners outside higher education institutions, while this is true just for<br />
20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4 th series projects.<br />
A look at <strong>the</strong> project participation by HEI (both coordinator and partners) gives a broader view<br />
and shows that, despite <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> leading houses, it was possible for most<br />
institutions to get involved in a sizeable number <strong>of</strong> projects.<br />
Project series 1 2 3 4 Total<br />
UNIBAS 10 10 13 11 44<br />
UNIBE 12 11 12 8 43<br />
EPFL 3 4 3 3 13<br />
ETHZ 5 7 8 6 26<br />
UNIFR 12 6 6 1 25<br />
UNIGE 7 8 9 9 33<br />
UNIL 10 12 7 8 37<br />
UNILU 0 1 0 0 1<br />
UNINE 8 0 4 2 14<br />
UNISG 2 1 3 2 8<br />
UNISI 4 2 9 7 22<br />
UZH 12 8 15 13 48<br />
BFH 6 2 8 4 20<br />
FHNW 5 5 8 5 23<br />
FHO 1 3 3 2 9<br />
HSLU 3 1 4 3 11<br />
HES-SO 7 2 4 4 17<br />
SUPSI 4 2 8 7 21<br />
ZFH 3 3 5 5 16<br />
total university 85 70 89 70 314<br />
total UAS 29 18 40 30 117<br />
total 114 88 129 100 431<br />
HEI abroad 6 4 2 7 19<br />
O<strong>the</strong>rs 14 10 14 4 42<br />
Table 12: Project participation by institution and series<br />
4.3.3 Project organisation<br />
This changing organization raises a number <strong>of</strong> interesting issues on <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> collaboration<br />
and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se projects on <strong>Swiss</strong> higher education. In <strong>the</strong> Impulse Programme, <strong>the</strong><br />
goal was possibly to establish large networks covering many institutions with courses on <strong>the</strong><br />
same subject domain, to allow for pooling and large reusability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> developed materials.<br />
Clearly, 3 rd and 4 th series projects have many more small-scale networks due also to reduced<br />
funding.<br />
In most ongoing projects from all series that answered our questionnaire (67 out <strong>of</strong> 80), <strong>the</strong><br />
leading house has a strong role – only two projects, one from <strong>the</strong> 1 st and one from <strong>the</strong> 3 rd series,<br />
denied this: in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, one partner plays <strong>the</strong> most important role, in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r one <strong>the</strong><br />
36