The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca
The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca
The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PRIVATE RECORDS. 181So again, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latest entries is as follows :—David Weddertram's(d) MemorandumMS.on <strong>the</strong> 24 Junij 1615. —(4 lines <strong>ca</strong>refully obliterated in <strong>the</strong> original). It is to berememberit I have subscryuit him (? whom) ane Dispositione <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nonetre <strong>of</strong> v acria land formit beWilliam Gray, Scheref Deput, quhairiu I grant I have receauit syluer. Item quhair I deleit <strong>the</strong> u<strong>the</strong>rwryttis maid betuix him and me in his eonforme. Item quhair he promesit to gif me ane honestsatisfactione in <strong>the</strong> agreing him and Mr. James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in getting him a relief <strong>of</strong> his <strong>ca</strong>utionrieanent Kynuard, etc.Not long, however, before this date David had lost possession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>book</strong>s. Itseems that <strong>the</strong> provost sent two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bailies to borrow <strong>the</strong>m and that David <strong>the</strong>reuponlent <strong>the</strong>m upon a guarantee that if <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong>s were not returned to him within fourteen•days, <strong>the</strong> provost should pay him a thousand merkis. Whe<strong>the</strong>r he ever got ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><strong>book</strong>s or <strong>the</strong> merks does not appear. He makes <strong>the</strong> following note <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter :—(e)Memorandum to persew Thomas Halyburtoun, provest <strong>of</strong> Dundie, for <strong>the</strong> wrangis intromissione withmy fa<strong>the</strong>ris protocolis extending to sex gryt bukis intromettit with (be ?) him <strong>of</strong> myn in <strong>the</strong> counselhouson <strong>the</strong> 17 <strong>of</strong> March 1629 aud promisit to restor me thame withiu 14 dayis thairefter or content me <strong>of</strong>a thousand merkis quhilk I askit fra Johne Kamsay and William Kyneres, baileis, sent be him to mein <strong>the</strong> Kyrkzaird thairfor.<strong>The</strong> six <strong>book</strong>s are now in <strong>the</strong> Dundee charter room though <strong>the</strong>y do not appear to havebeen <strong>the</strong>re in 1639, when Sir Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> made an inventory <strong>of</strong> all <strong>book</strong>s <strong>the</strong>nin his possession as clerk (post p. 206).19. O<strong>the</strong>r memoranda record all sorts <strong>of</strong> matters. I have already dealt with David'sgrievances against his bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> clerk. He seems to have <strong>ca</strong>rried <strong>the</strong>m beyond <strong>the</strong>grave. Thus <strong>the</strong>re is an undated 1 memorandum made after Kingennie's death in 1626,as follows :—(a) Memorandum to persew <strong>the</strong> clerk Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> my bro<strong>the</strong>r sone as air and successourto Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> his fa<strong>the</strong>r and air and successour to Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, commoueClerk <strong>of</strong> Dundie, his gudschir my fa<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong> soumes and <strong>ca</strong>ussis specefeit in my clame.Ano<strong>the</strong>r note, also undated, gives one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds <strong>of</strong> this claim.(6) Memorandum to crave <strong>the</strong> clerkschip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gild eonforme to my provisione and Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong>for intromissione with <strong>the</strong> beuefittis thair<strong>of</strong> my domage extending to 2000 merkis thairby.20. <strong>The</strong> following references, s<strong>ca</strong>ttered through <strong>the</strong> volume, all name a John<strong>Wedderburn</strong>, but <strong>ca</strong>nnot all refer to <strong>the</strong> same individual. 3(a) 2 Septembris 1589.—In presens <strong>of</strong> Alexander Dun<strong>ca</strong>n and John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Kyrkstyell delyueri*Robert <strong>Wedderburn</strong> my bro<strong>the</strong>r ane obligatione <strong>of</strong> William Kiulochs barbour <strong>of</strong> 2 C merkis and actitin <strong>the</strong> buikis <strong>of</strong> Elgyn ane Lettre <strong>of</strong> Inhibitione to <strong>the</strong> quhilk Thomas Guthre maid him assignaj (to)This in Kobertis awiu hous and I am exonerit thair<strong>of</strong>.(ft) 20 Merche 93.—In presens <strong>of</strong> Thomas Stewart Hary Balfour and John Auchinlek, James Reykylitster is oblist to litt alsmekle clayth to be my tua dochteris ilk ane <strong>of</strong> thame a cot <strong>of</strong> any hew I willrequyre for <strong>the</strong> quhilk 1 deiynerit to him his obligatione <strong>of</strong> 4 lib 40 d maid be him to my erne John<strong>Wedderburn</strong>, wryter, and rest <strong>the</strong> sam.(c) Ane obligatione maid be George Vat to me <strong>of</strong> x merkis to be payit at Lambes 1597. Subscryvit behim and Andro Ma<strong>the</strong>ws and Johne <strong>Wedderburn</strong> witnessis.{d) 21 July 1618,—Send to St. Andros with John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Mr. Dauid Kid <strong>the</strong> Edik andExecutionis to Mr. William Weyms.1At <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page on which this memorandum occurs is written " Upoun <strong>the</strong> v <strong>of</strong> July 1620 "but this relates to ano<strong>the</strong>r entry only. It <strong>ca</strong>nnot be <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> this one, which must have beenmade 1627— 33, <strong>the</strong> period during which David's nephew Alexander, here named as clerk, occupiedthat <strong>of</strong>fice. As <strong>the</strong> latest date written in <strong>the</strong> " Compt Bulk " is 12 Dec. 1630, this entry wasprobably made 1627—30.2John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Kirkstyell is, no doubt, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bishop <strong>of</strong> Dunblane. He died about1606, and was <strong>the</strong> great great grandson <strong>of</strong> James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Janet Barry, who lived "at <strong>the</strong>West Kirk style." <strong>The</strong> second <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above entries <strong>ca</strong>nnot refer to him, as he was a marinerand not a "wryter." It refers, <strong>the</strong>refore, to John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Craigie, son <strong>of</strong> James<strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Margaret Dundas, who appears to have bred to <strong>the</strong> law. He died about 1600.<strong>The</strong> word "erne," as applied to him <strong>ca</strong>nnot, however, be taken in its usual sense <strong>of</strong> "uncle."David'ji fa<strong>the</strong>r had no bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>ca</strong>lled John, and David always <strong>ca</strong>lls his uncles, Robert and Peter,his " fa<strong>the</strong>ris bro<strong>the</strong>ris " and not his "ernes." <strong>The</strong> word, <strong>the</strong>refore, here signifies relative orcousin. <strong>The</strong> third entry tc) may refer to eithsr <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se persons, while <strong>the</strong> next three (d, e,f)<strong>ca</strong>nnot do so, as at <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m both were dead. <strong>The</strong>y probably refer to <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Robert<strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Elizabeth Coustoun, <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prefix " Mr." making it clear that <strong>the</strong>ydo not refer to John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, afterwards Sir John <strong>of</strong> Gosford, <strong>the</strong> eminent physician, whohas been mentioned ante 2(6).