12.07.2015 Views

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRIVATE RECORDS. 181So again, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latest entries is as follows :—David Weddertram's(d) MemorandumMS.on <strong>the</strong> 24 Junij 1615. —(4 lines <strong>ca</strong>refully obliterated in <strong>the</strong> original). It is to berememberit I have subscryuit him (? whom) ane Dispositione <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nonetre <strong>of</strong> v acria land formit beWilliam Gray, Scheref Deput, quhairiu I grant I have receauit syluer. Item quhair I deleit <strong>the</strong> u<strong>the</strong>rwryttis maid betuix him and me in his eonforme. Item quhair he promesit to gif me ane honestsatisfactione in <strong>the</strong> agreing him and Mr. James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in getting him a relief <strong>of</strong> his <strong>ca</strong>utionrieanent Kynuard, etc.Not long, however, before this date David had lost possession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>book</strong>s. Itseems that <strong>the</strong> provost sent two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bailies to borrow <strong>the</strong>m and that David <strong>the</strong>reuponlent <strong>the</strong>m upon a guarantee that if <strong>the</strong> <strong>book</strong>s were not returned to him within fourteen•days, <strong>the</strong> provost should pay him a thousand merkis. Whe<strong>the</strong>r he ever got ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><strong>book</strong>s or <strong>the</strong> merks does not appear. He makes <strong>the</strong> following note <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matter :—(e)Memorandum to persew Thomas Halyburtoun, provest <strong>of</strong> Dundie, for <strong>the</strong> wrangis intromissione withmy fa<strong>the</strong>ris protocolis extending to sex gryt bukis intromettit with (be ?) him <strong>of</strong> myn in <strong>the</strong> counselhouson <strong>the</strong> 17 <strong>of</strong> March 1629 aud promisit to restor me thame withiu 14 dayis thairefter or content me <strong>of</strong>a thousand merkis quhilk I askit fra Johne Kamsay and William Kyneres, baileis, sent be him to mein <strong>the</strong> Kyrkzaird thairfor.<strong>The</strong> six <strong>book</strong>s are now in <strong>the</strong> Dundee charter room though <strong>the</strong>y do not appear to havebeen <strong>the</strong>re in 1639, when Sir Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> made an inventory <strong>of</strong> all <strong>book</strong>s <strong>the</strong>nin his possession as clerk (post p. 206).19. O<strong>the</strong>r memoranda record all sorts <strong>of</strong> matters. I have already dealt with David'sgrievances against his bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> clerk. He seems to have <strong>ca</strong>rried <strong>the</strong>m beyond <strong>the</strong>grave. Thus <strong>the</strong>re is an undated 1 memorandum made after Kingennie's death in 1626,as follows :—(a) Memorandum to persew <strong>the</strong> clerk Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> my bro<strong>the</strong>r sone as air and successourto Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong> his fa<strong>the</strong>r and air and successour to Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, commoueClerk <strong>of</strong> Dundie, his gudschir my fa<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong> soumes and <strong>ca</strong>ussis specefeit in my clame.Ano<strong>the</strong>r note, also undated, gives one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grounds <strong>of</strong> this claim.(6) Memorandum to crave <strong>the</strong> clerkschip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gild eonforme to my provisione and Mr. Alexander <strong>Wedderburn</strong>for intromissione with <strong>the</strong> beuefittis thair<strong>of</strong> my domage extending to 2000 merkis thairby.20. <strong>The</strong> following references, s<strong>ca</strong>ttered through <strong>the</strong> volume, all name a John<strong>Wedderburn</strong>, but <strong>ca</strong>nnot all refer to <strong>the</strong> same individual. 3(a) 2 Septembris 1589.—In presens <strong>of</strong> Alexander Dun<strong>ca</strong>n and John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Kyrkstyell delyueri*Robert <strong>Wedderburn</strong> my bro<strong>the</strong>r ane obligatione <strong>of</strong> William Kiulochs barbour <strong>of</strong> 2 C merkis and actitin <strong>the</strong> buikis <strong>of</strong> Elgyn ane Lettre <strong>of</strong> Inhibitione to <strong>the</strong> quhilk Thomas Guthre maid him assignaj (to)This in Kobertis awiu hous and I am exonerit thair<strong>of</strong>.(ft) 20 Merche 93.—In presens <strong>of</strong> Thomas Stewart Hary Balfour and John Auchinlek, James Reykylitster is oblist to litt alsmekle clayth to be my tua dochteris ilk ane <strong>of</strong> thame a cot <strong>of</strong> any hew I willrequyre for <strong>the</strong> quhilk 1 deiynerit to him his obligatione <strong>of</strong> 4 lib 40 d maid be him to my erne John<strong>Wedderburn</strong>, wryter, and rest <strong>the</strong> sam.(c) Ane obligatione maid be George Vat to me <strong>of</strong> x merkis to be payit at Lambes 1597. Subscryvit behim and Andro Ma<strong>the</strong>ws and Johne <strong>Wedderburn</strong> witnessis.{d) 21 July 1618,—Send to St. Andros with John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Mr. Dauid Kid <strong>the</strong> Edik andExecutionis to Mr. William Weyms.1At <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> page on which this memorandum occurs is written " Upoun <strong>the</strong> v <strong>of</strong> July 1620 "but this relates to ano<strong>the</strong>r entry only. It <strong>ca</strong>nnot be <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> this one, which must have beenmade 1627— 33, <strong>the</strong> period during which David's nephew Alexander, here named as clerk, occupiedthat <strong>of</strong>fice. As <strong>the</strong> latest date written in <strong>the</strong> " Compt Bulk " is 12 Dec. 1630, this entry wasprobably made 1627—30.2John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Kirkstyell is, no doubt, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bishop <strong>of</strong> Dunblane. He died about1606, and was <strong>the</strong> great great grandson <strong>of</strong> James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Janet Barry, who lived "at <strong>the</strong>West Kirk style." <strong>The</strong> second <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above entries <strong>ca</strong>nnot refer to him, as he was a marinerand not a "wryter." It refers, <strong>the</strong>refore, to John <strong>Wedderburn</strong> <strong>of</strong> Craigie, son <strong>of</strong> James<strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Margaret Dundas, who appears to have bred to <strong>the</strong> law. He died about 1600.<strong>The</strong> word "erne," as applied to him <strong>ca</strong>nnot, however, be taken in its usual sense <strong>of</strong> "uncle."David'ji fa<strong>the</strong>r had no bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>ca</strong>lled John, and David always <strong>ca</strong>lls his uncles, Robert and Peter,his " fa<strong>the</strong>ris bro<strong>the</strong>ris " and not his "ernes." <strong>The</strong> word, <strong>the</strong>refore, here signifies relative orcousin. <strong>The</strong> third entry tc) may refer to eithsr <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se persons, while <strong>the</strong> next three (d, e,f)<strong>ca</strong>nnot do so, as at <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m both were dead. <strong>The</strong>y probably refer to <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Robert<strong>Wedderburn</strong> and Elizabeth Coustoun, <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prefix " Mr." making it clear that <strong>the</strong>ydo not refer to John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, afterwards Sir John <strong>of</strong> Gosford, <strong>the</strong> eminent physician, whohas been mentioned ante 2(6).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!