12.07.2015 Views

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

The Wedderburn book. A history of the ... - waughfamily.ca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PUBLIC RECORDS—SCOTLAND. 389<strong>The</strong>re is among <strong>the</strong> Privy Council papers, a printed list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " Persons Iutereonimuned and Privydeclared Fugitives, since <strong>the</strong> year 1674, for not compearing before <strong>the</strong> Council, or Commissions <strong>of</strong> CouncilCouncil, to answer for Conventicles, &c, Whose names are to be affixt by Sheriffs and o<strong>the</strong>r Magis- Register,trates upon <strong>the</strong> publiot places <strong>of</strong> Judi<strong>ca</strong>ture, that <strong>the</strong>y may not have <strong>the</strong> benetite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Law in anyProcess ; and who are to be seized upon and secured until <strong>the</strong>y submit <strong>the</strong>mselves to <strong>the</strong> laws, andbe relaxed from <strong>the</strong> Horn." Follows <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> such as are denounced and Intereommuned. Ministers Iutereonimunedare, (among many o<strong>the</strong>rs) :—Mr James <strong>Wedderburn</strong>,"<strong>The</strong> Persons underwritten, for <strong>the</strong> most part are residents in Fife, and are denounced, but notIntereommuned, viz.. (among many :— o<strong>the</strong>rs) Mr. James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Couper."From this list it would seem that <strong>the</strong>re were two ministers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same name, both living in 1674.If so, <strong>the</strong>y must be J;mies <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, minister <strong>of</strong> Moouzie, and his son James, who was admitted hiscolleague in 1659. James <strong>Wedderburn</strong>, elder, however, is said (Fast. Eccl. Scot., II., 505) to havedied in 1661, and. although no authority is quoted for this date, he would certainly have been <strong>of</strong>considerable age in 1674, as he took his degree at S. Andrew's in 1608. Possibly <strong>the</strong> compiler <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>list overlooked <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>of</strong> his death, or erroneously placed his son (who died at Cupar 23 July 1687)in both its divisions : or, perhaps, <strong>the</strong> Christian name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first mentioned minister should beAlexander or Andrew, as Mr. James <strong>Wedderburn</strong> in Cupar had two such bro<strong>the</strong>rs, both ministers,<strong>of</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> latter was certainly in difficulties with <strong>the</strong> Government at about this time. (See anteNos. 63-65, 68.) It may be well to explain that persons "denounced" were declared to be rebels,while, as appears from <strong>the</strong> above extract (No. 67), everyone was prohibited, under severe penalties,from holding any intercourse with those " intereommuned."68. 1684. Jan. 23.—Petition by Helen Turnbull, relict <strong>of</strong> Mr. Alexander Wedderbuine,late minister at Kilmarnock. (Vol. 1082-85, fol. 221.)<strong>The</strong> Petition shows that <strong>the</strong> Petitioner's husband died in November 1678, and left <strong>the</strong>Petitioner with <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> " many young children with little or no provision," and that <strong>the</strong>Petitioner having applied to <strong>the</strong> Council in October 1680 for <strong>the</strong> stipend <strong>of</strong> that crop <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parish<strong>of</strong> Kilmarnock wdiich was <strong>the</strong>n va<strong>ca</strong>nt, <strong>the</strong> Lords declared <strong>the</strong>y would allow <strong>the</strong> same to her for thatyear, or <strong>the</strong> equivalent <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> from <strong>the</strong> va<strong>ca</strong>nt stipends (<strong>the</strong> Archbishop <strong>of</strong> Glasgow being firstsatisfied <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> £300 sterling ordained to be paid to him out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> va<strong>ca</strong>ncies <strong>of</strong> his Diocese),and seeing <strong>the</strong> Petitioner did not receive <strong>the</strong> va<strong>ca</strong>nt stipend <strong>of</strong> Kilmarnock for that year, which <strong>the</strong>said Archbishop applied to o<strong>the</strong>r uses by virtue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council's Order ; <strong>the</strong>refore craves that <strong>the</strong>Council, from commiseration <strong>of</strong> her own and her fa<strong>the</strong>rless children's condition, would allow <strong>the</strong>m<strong>the</strong> va<strong>ca</strong>nt stipend <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parish <strong>of</strong> Dunlap for <strong>the</strong> year 1683 : which petition <strong>the</strong> Council grant, inplace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> half year's stipend <strong>of</strong> Kilmarnock.69. 1685. Sept. 11.— <strong>The</strong> Lords <strong>of</strong> Privy Council, understanding that <strong>the</strong> troop <strong>of</strong>Horse under <strong>the</strong> command <strong>of</strong> Major John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>c <strong>of</strong> Gosfoord are convenientlyposted for His Majesty's service in <strong>the</strong> town and shire <strong>of</strong> Lanark, do allow <strong>the</strong> saidMajor John <strong>Wedderburn</strong>e to continue <strong>the</strong>m quartered <strong>the</strong>re until fur<strong>the</strong>r order.(Vol. 1685, fol. 160.)70. 1686. Jane 3.— At Edinburgh. His Majestie's High Commissioner and <strong>the</strong> Lords <strong>of</strong>His Privy Council in pursuance <strong>of</strong> His Majestie's Commands, dated at his Court atWhitehall <strong>the</strong> twentieth second day <strong>of</strong> May last by-past, hereby Recommend toGeneral Lievtemiant Drummond to remove from His Majestie's Service John AVedderburne<strong>of</strong> Gosfoord as Lievtemiant Collonell <strong>of</strong> His Majestie's Regiment <strong>of</strong> Dragoones,commanded by Lord Charles Murrry as Collonell, and to signify His Majestie'spleasure <strong>the</strong>rein, and to see <strong>the</strong> same punctually performed and that in pursuance <strong>of</strong>His Majestie's Letter aforesaid. Extr. by me Will. Paterson, Cler. Sec Concilij.(Privy Council Warrants, s.d.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!