13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 the <strong>world</strong> <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> monsan<strong>to</strong>Fired for “Incompetence”Burroughs is a veterinarian with a degree from Cornell who started out witha private practice in New York, where his parents had a dairy herd. “I adorecows,” he said with a smile that lit up his sixty-year-old face. “That’s why Ichose this profession.” In 1979, he was hired by the FDA, which offeredhim training in <strong>to</strong>xicology. “I agreed <strong>to</strong> leave my home<strong>to</strong>wn for Washing<strong>to</strong>n,because I felt it was essential.” Like almost everyone, he believed that anyproduct that had been approved in the United States would pose no problems.And the FDA was the agency that did the approving.Officially named the FDA in 1930 (although it has existed under differentnames since early in the century), the agency is charged with approving themarketing <strong>and</strong> sale of food <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical products intended for humanor animal consumption. Its bible is the Food, Drug, <strong>and</strong> Cosmetic Act,signed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1938. This restrictive law,from which the FDA derives its authority, was intended as a response <strong>to</strong> anational tragedy. A year earlier one hundred people had died after takingElixir Sulfanilamide, a medication made with a solvent that turned out <strong>to</strong> befatal. <strong>The</strong> new law required that in the future any product containing newsubstances be tested by the manufacturer <strong>and</strong> submitted <strong>to</strong> the FDA for approvalbefore being put on the market. In 1958, the “Delaney amendment”was added, providing that if a product presented the slightest carcinogenicrisk, it could not be approved.* It is important <strong>to</strong> note that the agency itselfdoes not conduct <strong>to</strong>xicological studies, such as animal testing, but merelyexamines the data supplied by manufacturers.So it was that Burroughs, who was working at the FDA’s Center for VeterinaryMedicine (CVM), was given the task of analyzing the request <strong>to</strong> approvefor sale a bovine growth hormone, bovine soma<strong>to</strong>tropin (BST),manufactured by Monsan<strong>to</strong> through genetic manipulation <strong>and</strong> designed <strong>to</strong>be injected in cows twice a month <strong>to</strong> increase their milk production by atleast 15 percent.† “For the CVM, it was a completely revolutionary prod-*Named after a Democratic representative from New York, James Delaney (1901–87), who wouldcertainly be spinning in his grave if he could read this.†In the 1970s, three other companies manufactured the transgenic hormone: Elanco, a subsidiaryof Eli Lilly; Upjohn; <strong>and</strong> American Cyanamid. But finally only Monsan<strong>to</strong> stayed in the running.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!