13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oundup: a massive brainwashing operation 81put the fertilized eggs in a diluted solution of Roundup. I might emphasizethat the concentration was well below that generally used in agriculture. Wethen observed the effects of the product on millions of cell divisions. Wevery soon realized that Roundup affected a key point in cell division—notthe mechanisms of cell division itself, but those that control it. To underst<strong>and</strong>the importance of this discovery, you have <strong>to</strong> recall the mechanism ofcell division. When a cell divides in<strong>to</strong> two daughter cells, the making of twocopies of the genetic inheritance, in the form of DNA, gives rise <strong>to</strong> manyerrors, as many as fifty thous<strong>and</strong> per cell. Normally, a process of repair or thenatural death of the defective cell, known as “apop<strong>to</strong>sis,” is au<strong>to</strong>maticallyinitiated. But a cell sometimes avoids the alternative [death or repair], becausethe point that controls damage <strong>to</strong> the DNA is affected. It is preciselythis checkpoint that is damaged by Roundup. And that’s why we say thatRoundup induces the early stages leading <strong>to</strong> cancer. In fact, by avoiding therepair mechanisms, the affected cell will be able <strong>to</strong> perpetuate itself in a geneticallyunstable form, <strong>and</strong> we now know that it can be the origin of a cancerthat will develop thirty or forty years later.”“Were you able <strong>to</strong> determine what it was in Roundup that affected celldivision?”“That is a crucial question. Indeed, we also conducted the experimentwith pure glyphosate, that is, with none of the additives that go in<strong>to</strong>Roundup, <strong>and</strong> we did not observe any effects, so it’s Roundup that is <strong>to</strong>xic,not its active ingredient. But when we looked at the tests that were used forthe registration of Roundup, we were surprised <strong>to</strong> find that they had beenconducted with glyphosate alone. In fact, pure glyphosate has no use, noteven as a herbicide, because by itself it is unable <strong>to</strong> penetrate in<strong>to</strong> cells <strong>and</strong>thereby affect them. That’s why I think there is a real problem with the registrationprocess of Roundup <strong>and</strong> it would be necessary <strong>to</strong> look more closelyat the numerous additives that go in<strong>to</strong> it <strong>and</strong> at their interaction.”Among the suspect additives is polyethoxylated tallowamine, whose acute<strong>to</strong>xicity has been confirmed by many studies. Roundup also contains inertingredients about which nothing can be said because their identity has notbeen disclosed by the manufacturer, under a claim of “trade secrets.” 22 Anotherfac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> consider is the principal product of the biodegradation ofglyphosate, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA),which has a long half-life.In the face of these obvious malfunctions of the registration process,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!