13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the iron law of the patenting of life 221as waterhemp <strong>and</strong> ragweed. For example, a University of Delaware studyshowed that horsetail plants taken from RR soybean fields survived tentimes the recommended dose of Roundup. 53 In addition <strong>to</strong> those weeds alreadyidentified as Roundup-resistant, there is a whole list of glyphosate<strong>to</strong>lerantweeds, that is, not yet resistant but for which doses have <strong>to</strong> bemultiplied by three or four <strong>to</strong> get rid of them.<strong>The</strong> Dark Side of Biotechnology“Specific weed resistance can reduce a farm’s rentable value by 17 percent.”This was one of the conclusions of a 2002 report from Syngenta, a Swisscompany that was one of Monsan<strong>to</strong>’s principal competi<strong>to</strong>rs, sent <strong>to</strong> all itsagricultural cus<strong>to</strong>mers. 54 Relying on a survey of American farmers, thechemical <strong>and</strong> biotech giant reported that 47 percent of them favored a return<strong>to</strong> “crop <strong>and</strong> chemical rotation.” As Charles Benbrook noted in early2002, the decline in profitability was not the only “bad news” about what hecalled the “dark side” of biotechnology, which “scientists are now unraveling<strong>and</strong> farmers are just learning about.” 55First, contrary <strong>to</strong> what Monsan<strong>to</strong> has always claimed in its advertising, itis not true that “under comparable growing conditions, the yields for thesenew lines are expected <strong>to</strong> be equivalent <strong>to</strong> other <strong>to</strong>p-yielding varieties.” 56“Unfortunately, we proved the opposite,” Roger Elmore, an agronomist, <strong>to</strong>ldme. In 2001, he <strong>and</strong> colleagues at the University of Nebraska published astudy on the subject. 57 Now at the University of Iowa, near where I met himat his home in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2006, he <strong>to</strong>ld me: “We conducted this study, for twoyears <strong>and</strong> in four different locations, because we had received informationfrom various states indicating that transgenic soybeans had lower yields thanrelated conventional varieties. Our results prove that yields decline by atleast 5 percent.”“How do you explain it?” I asked, scrutinizing his chart.“It’s what we call ‘yield drag.’ We had two hypotheses that might explainthe drag affecting the yield of transgenic plants: either it was due <strong>to</strong> the effec<strong>to</strong>f Roundup on plant metabolism, or it was the result of genetic manipulation.To test the first hypothesis, we grew three groups of RR soybeansfrom the same strain, one of which was sprayed with Roundup, a secondwith ammonium sulfate, a product that stimulates the action of herbicides,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!