13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the bovine growth hormone affair, part one 99<strong>The</strong> IGF-1 produced by human growth hormone is identical <strong>to</strong> that producedby bovine growth hormone, whereas the two hormones are noticeablydifferent. <strong>The</strong>rein lies the problem <strong>and</strong> also the origin of the scientificsleight of h<strong>and</strong> used by the promoters of rBGH <strong>to</strong> substantiate its harmlessness.Said another way, the pituitary of the cow <strong>and</strong> of the human eachproduce a specific growth hormone, both of which, however, induce theproduction of the same substance, IGF-1, the function of which is <strong>to</strong> stimulatethe proliferation of cells, thereby causing organisms <strong>to</strong> grow. When,for example, Jean-Yves Nau writes in Le Monde, “This hormone is specific<strong>to</strong> the animal species from which it comes <strong>and</strong> thus can have no effec<strong>to</strong>n human metabolism, whether it is in milk or meat that is consumed,” heis mistaken. 7<strong>The</strong> “detail” is all the more important because there is one fact aboutwhich everyone is in agreement: the level of IGF-1 is distinctly higher in themilk of cows treated with transgenic growth hormone than in natural milk.According <strong>to</strong> the Science article, the increase can be as high as 75 percent! 8But the FDA added that “rBGH is biologically <strong>and</strong> orally inactive in humans”because it “cannot be absorbed in the blood” <strong>and</strong> when ingested“would be expected <strong>to</strong> be degraded in the human gastrointestinal tract in thesame manner as other proteins.” “This is completely false,” <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> Epstein<strong>and</strong> Hansen. “Several studies have confirmed that IGF-1 is not destroyedin digestion, because it is protected by casein, the principal proteinin milk.” 9Clearly fully aware of the stakes, the FDA scientists hazarded a final argument:“Furthermore, 90% of rBGH is destroyed upon pasteurization. . . .<strong>The</strong> use of rBGH in dairy cattle presents no increased health risk <strong>to</strong> consumers.”“This is the height of bad faith,” <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> Hardin, who showedme the study on which this assertion is supposedly based. It was conductedby Paul Groenewegen, a Canadian doc<strong>to</strong>ral student, on an assignment fromMonsan<strong>to</strong>. He heated milk of transgenic origin <strong>to</strong> 162º Fahrenheit (approximately90º Celsius) for thirty minutes. “<strong>The</strong> normal time for pasteurizationis fifteen seconds,” Hardin pointed out. “Milk pasteurized in these conditionsno longer has any nutritional value, <strong>and</strong> yet 10 percent of the IGF-1was not destroyed.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!