13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

238 the <strong>world</strong> <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> monsan<strong>to</strong>the organic farmers in Saskatchewan, requesting damages from Monsan<strong>to</strong><strong>and</strong> Aventis for the loss of their canola crops. 41 On December 13, 2007, theSupreme Court of Canada finally rejected the claim on technical grounds,determining that the complaint, whose basis it did not challenge, could notbe treated in a class action but only through individual cases.In the interim, what Loiselle <strong>and</strong> his colleagues criticized had been confirmedby a scientific study conducted by René Van Acker, an agronomistfrom the University of Mani<strong>to</strong>ba, at the request of the Canadian WheatBoard. 42 “We conducted tests in twenty-seven grain eleva<strong>to</strong>rs of certifiednon-transgenic canola seeds <strong>and</strong> we found that 80 percent were contaminatedby the Roundup Ready gene,” Van Acker <strong>to</strong>ld me when I met him inOttawa in September 2004. “That means that now almost all Canadiancanola fields include Roundup Ready plants. As for organic canola, it has alreadydisappeared in Canada, where it’s hard <strong>to</strong> find three square miles withno GMOs.”“How were you able <strong>to</strong> use the experience with canola for wheat?”“<strong>The</strong> Canadian Wheat Board asked us <strong>to</strong> determine whether theRoundup Ready gene was likely <strong>to</strong> move from one wheat crop <strong>to</strong> another. Toanswer that question, we constructed a model of the flow of genes, which incanola operates from what we call ‘gene bridges.’ We compared all the elementsof the model, one by one, <strong>and</strong> we determined that the situation wouldbe similar for wheat <strong>and</strong> that a flow of genes was also possible.”“Couldn’t two separate channels be organized based on the segregation ofseeds?” I asked, adopting the argument frequently put forth by the promotersof biotechnology.“It’s impossible. Contamination in the field is inevitable <strong>and</strong> it makes anyattempt at segregation before planting ineffective.”This conviction is shared by the owners of grain eleva<strong>to</strong>rs, confirmed by asurvey conducted in 2003 by the Institute for Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Trade Policyin Minneapolis. 43 It showed that 82 percent of the owners contacted were“very concerned” by the possible marketing of RR wheat, because “it’s impossible<strong>to</strong> have a segregation system with zero <strong>to</strong>lerance.” Two years earlier,an internal memor<strong>and</strong>um (obtained by Greenpeace) from Agriculture <strong>and</strong>Agri-Food Canada <strong>to</strong> the Minister of Agriculture, Lyle Vanclief, revealedthat the segregation argument didn’t convince government officials themselves:“If transgenic wheat is registered, it will be difficult <strong>and</strong> costly <strong>to</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!