13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92 the <strong>world</strong> <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> monsan<strong>to</strong>which can leave residues in the milk. So it’s all very serious. In addition, youhave <strong>to</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> that the transgenic hormone upsets the cow’s natural cycle.Normally, a cow produces soma<strong>to</strong>tropin after calving, which enables it<strong>to</strong> feed its calf. As the calf grows, the secretion of the hormone slows <strong>and</strong> finallys<strong>to</strong>ps. To restart milk production, the cow therefore has <strong>to</strong> have anothercalf. rBGH makes it possible <strong>to</strong> artificially maintain milk productionbeyond the natural cycle. This is why it can create reproductive problems forthe cow, <strong>and</strong> thus cause financial loss <strong>to</strong> the breeder. When I saw that allthese data were lacking, I asked Monsan<strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong> go back <strong>to</strong> the drawing board,which <strong>to</strong>ok two <strong>to</strong> three years, because for the study <strong>to</strong> be valid, it had <strong>to</strong> followchanges in cows through at least three cycles.”“And what were the results of the new studies?”“First, I have <strong>to</strong> say they were of very poor scientific quality. For example,if you want <strong>to</strong> measure the impact of the transgenic hormone on mastitis,you have <strong>to</strong> select in each herd a group treated with the hormone <strong>and</strong> an untreatedcontrol group raised in strictly identical conditions. But Monsan<strong>to</strong>had dispersed the treated <strong>and</strong> untreated cows among different experimentalsites <strong>and</strong> subsequently mixed all the results <strong>to</strong>gether. I was once againforced <strong>to</strong> make adjustments. I also remember an unannounced visit I made<strong>to</strong> one of their labora<strong>to</strong>ries that was supposed <strong>to</strong> be analyzing the effect ofthe hormone on cows’ tissues <strong>and</strong> organs: I discovered that kidneys had disappeared.In spite of all these technical defects, it came out clearly from thestudies that the frequency of mastitis was much higher.”“Did you inform your superiors at the FDA?”“Yes, <strong>and</strong> at first they reacted properly.”In fact, a document dated March 4, 1988, attests that Richard P. Lehmann,direc<strong>to</strong>r of the Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation at the CVM,conveyed Burroughs’s concerns <strong>to</strong> Terrence Harvey of Monsan<strong>to</strong>:* “Wehave completed our review <strong>and</strong> find your application incomplete. <strong>The</strong> dataare incomplete <strong>and</strong> lack full reports of adequate tests. ...You have notclearly identified the incidence of clinical <strong>and</strong> subclinical mastitis in theherds tested....You should clarify your regimen of treatment for mastitis....You should address the use of gentamicin <strong>and</strong> tetracycline whichare not approved for the treatment of mastitis in dairy cattle. ...You have*Harvey had spent his entire career at the FDA, where he headed the CVM, before moving <strong>to</strong> Monsan<strong>to</strong>as direc<strong>to</strong>r of regula<strong>to</strong>ry affairs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!