13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

monsan<strong>to</strong> weaves its web, 1995–1999 193discovery <strong>to</strong> people in the business. Dick Mahoney, the CEO at the time,thought immediately of Pioneer Hi-Bred International, which controlled 20percent of the American seed market (40 percent for corn <strong>and</strong> 10 percentfor soybeans). Founded in Des Moines in 1926 by Henry Wallace (vice presiden<strong>to</strong>f the United States from 1941 <strong>to</strong> 1945), the company was known primarilyfor having invented the hybrid corn varieties that made its fortune.<strong>The</strong> underlying principle was that instead of allowing corn <strong>to</strong> be pollinatednaturally through the air, they forced plants <strong>to</strong> inbreed <strong>to</strong> obtain purelines with stable genetic characteristics. <strong>The</strong> results were hybrids that producedhigher yields but whose seeds were practically sterile. For seed dealers,this was a godsend because farmers were forced <strong>to</strong> buy their seeds everyyear. This hybridization technique worked only for allogamous plants, thatis, plants produced by fertilization of the ovum of one plant by pollen fromanother plant, not for au<strong>to</strong>gamous plants such as wheat or soybeans, whereeach plant reproduces itself with its internal male <strong>and</strong> female organs. I willlater describe how this detail did not escape Monsan<strong>to</strong>, which got around itby means of the patent system.In 2002, Daniel Charles reported in detail the amazing s<strong>to</strong>ry of Monsan<strong>to</strong>’smutation in the 1990s in Lords of the Harvest, which is the basis forwhat follows. When Robert Shapiro, who was then head of Monsan<strong>to</strong>’s agriculturaldivision, met Tom Urban, chief executive of Pioneer Hi-Bred International,<strong>to</strong> give him a sales pitch for his Roundup Ready gene, he wasreceived coolly: “‘Congratulations! You’ve got a gene! Guess what? We’ve gotfifty thous<strong>and</strong> genes! ...You don’t hold the keys <strong>to</strong> the market. We do! Youought <strong>to</strong> pay us for the right <strong>to</strong> put your gene in our varieties!’” 32 At the time,Shapiro had no choice: after years of costly research, the company’s instructionswere that finally it was time <strong>to</strong> bring in some money. A first agreementwas signed with Pioneer, which agreed <strong>to</strong> introduce the Roundup Readygene in<strong>to</strong> its soybean varieties. In return, remembering his success withNutraSweet for Diet Coke, Shapiro got an agreement <strong>to</strong> have “RoundupReady” printed on the seed bags. But in the end, there was nothing <strong>to</strong> boastabout. As Charles points out: “<strong>The</strong> Roundup Ready gene had become a vehicle<strong>to</strong> sell more of Monsan<strong>to</strong>’s chemicals, but little more.” 33A second set of negotiations then began over the other genetic characteristicthat Monsan<strong>to</strong> had in its arsenal: the Bt gene, which was an urgentmatter, because several companies were claiming authorship (leading <strong>to</strong> aninterminable patent battle). In this case, the GMO was not associated with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!