13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 the <strong>world</strong> <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> monsan<strong>to</strong>1997. But that was not enough: it had had <strong>to</strong> incur record indebtedness,backed by the s<strong>to</strong>ck market, which still believed at the time in the promiseof biotechnology. Monsan<strong>to</strong>’s s<strong>to</strong>ck price climbed 74 percent in 1995 <strong>and</strong> 71percent in 1996. Inves<strong>to</strong>rs blindly followed the “guru of St. Louis” until thefalse move in 1998 that initiated his fall from grace.<strong>The</strong> Termina<strong>to</strong>r Patent: One Step Too Far for Monsan<strong>to</strong>On March 3, 1998, a brief article in the Wall Street Journal announced thatthe USDA (then headed by Dan Glickman) <strong>and</strong> the Delta <strong>and</strong> Pine L<strong>and</strong>Company of Mississippi, the largest American cot<strong>to</strong>n seed company, hadjointly obtained a patent entitled “Control of Plant Gene Expression.” Behindthis mysterious title lay a technique making it possible <strong>to</strong> geneticallymodify plants so that they produced sterile seeds. Developed by MelvinOliver, an Australian scientist working in the USDA research labora<strong>to</strong>ry inLubbock, Texas, the technique was also called the “Technology ProtectionSystem” (unders<strong>to</strong>od <strong>to</strong> be transgenic), because it was designed <strong>to</strong> preventfarmers from resowing part of their crop, forcing them <strong>to</strong> buy seeds everyyear <strong>and</strong> pay royalties <strong>to</strong> GMO manufacturers. Concretely, the plant hadbeen manipulated <strong>to</strong> produce a <strong>to</strong>xic protein when its growth was completethat made its seeds sterile.Hope Sh<strong>and</strong>, research direc<strong>to</strong>r of the Rural Advancement FoundationInternational (RAFI), a Canadian NGO since renamed the ETC Group(Erosion, Technology, Concentration), which fights for the protection ofbiodiversity <strong>and</strong> against the perverse effects of industrial agriculture, cameacross the article in the Wall Street Journal by chance. She immediately informedher boss, Pat Mooney, who said, “It’s Termina<strong>to</strong>r!” referring <strong>to</strong> thelegendary robot played by Arnold Schwarzenegger. <strong>The</strong> expression stuckpermanently <strong>to</strong> designate the sterilization technique <strong>and</strong>, beyond that, theoverall aim of GMO producers. “You underst<strong>and</strong>,” Mooney <strong>to</strong>ld me when Imet him in Ottawa in September 2004, “this technique was a direct threat<strong>to</strong> food security, especially in developing countries where more than 1.5 billionpeople survive by saving seeds. Imagine that Termina<strong>to</strong>r plants crossbreedwith neighboring crops <strong>and</strong> make the seeds gathered by peasantssterile. It would be a catastrophe for them, but also for the biodiversity they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!