13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182 the <strong>world</strong> <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> monsan<strong>to</strong><strong>The</strong> ITV interviewer asked Pusztai: “Does the lack of tests of GMOsworry you?”“Yes,” he replied without hesitation.“Would you eat transgenic pota<strong>to</strong>es?”“No. And as a scientist actively working in the field, I find it’s very unfair<strong>to</strong> use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs.”At first, the direc<strong>to</strong>rs of the Rowett Institute saw nothing <strong>to</strong> criticize inthe sentence repeatedly aired in promotional spots for World in Actionon August 9, 1998. <strong>The</strong> next day, the Institute was flooded with interviewrequests, <strong>and</strong> Professor James was only <strong>to</strong>o pleased <strong>to</strong> praise a study thatbrought such publicity. <strong>The</strong> night of the broadcast, August 10, the direc<strong>to</strong>rcould not keep himself from calling Pusztai <strong>to</strong> congratulate him for his performanceon television: “He was very enthusiastic,” Pusztai recalled. “<strong>The</strong>n,suddenly, everything changed.”On August 12, while a mob of reporters was waiting outside his house,Pusztai was summoned <strong>to</strong> a meeting where Philip James, accompanied by alawyer, <strong>to</strong>ld him that his contract had been suspended, he would be dismissed,<strong>and</strong> the research team would be dissolved. <strong>The</strong> computers <strong>and</strong> documentsconnected <strong>to</strong> the study were confiscated <strong>and</strong> the telephone linescut. Pusztai was put under a gag order under threat of prosecution. <strong>The</strong>nbegan an appalling disinformation campaign designed <strong>to</strong> sully his reputation<strong>and</strong>, by the same <strong>to</strong>ken, the validity of his warning. In several interviews,James claimed that Pusztai had made a mistake <strong>and</strong>, contrary <strong>to</strong> what he believed,had used not snowdrop lectin but another lectin called concanavalinA (con A), derived from a South American bean <strong>and</strong> known <strong>to</strong> be <strong>to</strong>xic.In other words, the effects observed in the rats were due not <strong>to</strong> geneticmanipulation but <strong>to</strong> con A, a “naturally occurring poison,” as Dr. Colin Merritt,British spokesman for Monsan<strong>to</strong>, hastened <strong>to</strong> point out. 2 “Instead of rodentsfed with genetically altered pota<strong>to</strong>es, Dr. Pusztai had used the resultsof tests carried out on rats treated with poison,” <strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> the ScottishDaily Record. 3 “If you mix cyanide with vermouth in a cocktail <strong>and</strong> find thatis not good for you, I don’t draw sweeping conclusions that you should banall mixed drinks,” was the ironic comment of Sir Robert May, a governmentscience advisor. 4 In France, Le Monde picked up this “news,” which was especiallystrange because it involved the <strong>world</strong>’s greatest specialist on lectin:“Dr. Pusztai confused data from a line of transgenic pota<strong>to</strong>es, the study ofwhich had barely begun, <strong>and</strong> other data from experiments consisting of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!