13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the iron law of the patenting of life 223ple, scientists in Georgia were contacted by soybean producers complainingthat the stems of their plants were splitting for unknown reasons, leading <strong>to</strong>extremely low yields. <strong>The</strong>ir study revealed that transgenic soybeans produce20 percent more lignin than conventional soybeans, which, at higher thannormal temperatures, made the stems exceptionally fragile. 61An Economic Disaster“<strong>The</strong>re’s profit in your fields. Unleash it with Asgrow Roundup Ready soybeans.”This ad published by a Monsan<strong>to</strong> subsidiary in a farm magazine inJanuary 2002 did not convince the Soil Association, which wrote in Seeds ofDoubt: “<strong>The</strong> evidence we have gathered demonstrates that GM food cropsare far from a success s<strong>to</strong>ry. In complete contrast <strong>to</strong> the impression given bythe biotechnology industry, it is clear that they have not realised most of theclaimed benefits <strong>and</strong> have been a practical <strong>and</strong> economic disaster.”Monsan<strong>to</strong> was quick <strong>to</strong> reply <strong>to</strong> this stinging indictment that one could expectnothing less from one of the principal European organizations for the promotionof organic farming. But this assessment was also that of researcherswho had taken the trouble <strong>to</strong> consider all aspects of transgenic agriculture <strong>to</strong>determine whether, from a strictly economic point of view, the effort paidoff. Michael Duffy, a University of Iowa economist, for example, conducteda study in cooperation with the National Agricultural Statistical Service ofUSDA. He went through the accounts of the state’s farmers item by item,comparing production costs <strong>and</strong> revenues for RR soybeans (108 fields) <strong>and</strong>conventional soybeans (64 fields) in the 2000 harvest. <strong>The</strong> result was beyondquestion: if all fac<strong>to</strong>rs of production were taken in<strong>to</strong> account (cost of seeds,herbicide use, yield, fuel costs, fertilizer, <strong>and</strong> so on), producers of transgenicsoybeans lost $8.87 per acre compared <strong>to</strong> $0.02 for producers of conventionalsoybeans. 62 It should be noted that this study was conducted in the midst of aprice war on herbicides that had lowered costs <strong>and</strong> at a time when weeds werenot Roundup resistant. Michael Duffy also compared earnings from Bt corn<strong>and</strong> conventional corn <strong>and</strong> came <strong>to</strong> a similar conclusion: $28.28 loss per acrefor the former <strong>and</strong> $25.02 loss for the latter.One might be surprised that farmers lost money in producing in all cases.This was precisely another drawback of GMOs, which had produced a collapseof American exports <strong>to</strong> Europe <strong>and</strong> a resulting price decline. Under

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!