13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the bovine growth hormone affair, part two 125of my work over the ten previous years dealing with rBST reviews. So I decidedthat I would document this <strong>and</strong> send a memo <strong>to</strong> my chief. I came backafter the weekend <strong>and</strong> again looked in the file cabinet <strong>and</strong> there were someadditional files back in. . . . <strong>The</strong>n an investigation began with the securitygroup in Health Canada. After interviewing me, Sergeant Fiegenwald <strong>to</strong>oksome of the files that were back for fingerprinting, <strong>and</strong> he also asked me <strong>to</strong>write statements on anything I could recall or that I thought might havecaused these documents <strong>to</strong> be removed. I provided him with the original,<strong>and</strong> I kept a copy for myself. A few months later, in November of 1994,when I was away on sick leave, a member of Health Canada Security Departmentcalled me <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>ed that I provide the copy of my statements.She came <strong>to</strong> my home <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>ed these. I have never seen those sincethat time, so that was kind of a surprise.”“Would you say the files that you had were pro-rBST or anti-rBST?” askedSena<strong>to</strong>r Nicholas Taylor.“<strong>The</strong>re were a lot of questions that I had asked, <strong>and</strong> there were numerouswhat we call ‘additional data letters’ asking questions of the company <strong>to</strong> provideadditional information. So at that point I was not recommending thatthe drug be approved from a point of view of safety in the intended speciesor efficacy.”“I gather if, after your research, people offered you rBST-treated milk, youwould not want <strong>to</strong> drink it?”“Personally, I would probably decline.”“I do not believe I am in Canada, when I hear you that your files havebeen s<strong>to</strong>len!” said Sena<strong>to</strong>r Eugene Whelan. “What in the hell kind of systemhave we got? Do not forget that I was minister for eleven years, <strong>and</strong> researchwas my favorite <strong>to</strong>pic. . . . So I have every reason <strong>to</strong> be skeptical when webecome more dependent all the time on Monsan<strong>to</strong> <strong>and</strong> these companies doingthe research for us. ...I have strong reservations about less <strong>and</strong> lesspublic research <strong>and</strong> big grants by Monsan<strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong> Agriculture Canada for this,<strong>and</strong> big grants <strong>to</strong> somebody else from another company for that. ...I wouldask each one of you, has any one of you been lobbied by Monsan<strong>to</strong>?”“I will describe the situation,” said Haydon. “I am not sure ‘lobby’ is thecorrect word, but I did attend a meeting back approximately in 1989 <strong>to</strong>1990, <strong>and</strong> Monsan<strong>to</strong> representatives had met with myself <strong>and</strong> my supervisor,Dr. Drennan, <strong>and</strong> my direc<strong>to</strong>r, Mr. Messier. At that meeting, an offer ofone <strong>to</strong> two million dollars was made by the company. I do not know any more

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!