13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the bovine growth hormone affair, part two 115Massacre on the Farm“Look,” Kinsman said <strong>to</strong> me, “I kept a promotional leaflet from Monsan<strong>to</strong>singing the praises of Posilac.” He read: “Cows treated with Posilac are invery good health. . . . <strong>The</strong> performance of calves born from treated cows isexcellent.”“That’s a lie,” Terry protested. “I used the growth hormone on twelve cowsin my herd. I very soon noticed that they were losing a huge amount ofweight. I kept on increasing the feed rations, but nothing could be done <strong>and</strong>they grew thinner right before your eyes. At the end of the lactation period,I wanted <strong>to</strong> have them inseminated, <strong>and</strong> I tried four or five times, but itnever worked. None of the cows I had injected gave me a calf. In the end, Isold them for slaughter. Fortunately, I saved the rest of the herd, or else Iwould have lost everything.”“That’s what happened <strong>to</strong> many farmers in Wisconsin,” said Kinsman,who referred me <strong>to</strong> a 1995 study by Mark Kastel, an independent consultantworking at the time for the Wisconsin Farmers Union. 9 In late summer1994—that is, six months after Posilac had been put on the market—thefarmers’ organization, in cooperation with the National Farmers Union,based in Denver, set up a <strong>to</strong>ll-free number for users of the hormone. <strong>The</strong>first farmer who would allow his name <strong>to</strong> be used was John Shumway ofNew York, who had given an interview about his difficulties <strong>to</strong> a localweekly. 10 After barely two months of injections, he had had <strong>to</strong> sacrifice onequarterof his herd, about fifty cows, because of acute problems with mastitis.Recontacted a year later, in September 1995, Shumway said that he hadreplaced 135 of his original herd of 200, <strong>and</strong> that his losses came <strong>to</strong> about$100,000, from a combination of the decline in milk production <strong>and</strong> thepurchase of new animals.<strong>The</strong> <strong>to</strong>ll-free number was soon swamped with calls from dairy farmersaround the United States. For example, Melvin Van Heel—70 cows inMinnesota—reported that he no longer knew how <strong>to</strong> treat his animals, whichwere suffering from mastitis <strong>and</strong> huge abscesses at injection sites. Al Core—150 cows in Florida—noticed that his cows could no longer walk because ofthe great weight of their udders <strong>and</strong> that they limped because of wounds ontheir legs <strong>and</strong> hooves; in addition, three treated cows had given birth <strong>to</strong> deformedcalves (legs above their heads or external s<strong>to</strong>machs); Jay Livings<strong>to</strong>n—

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!