13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dioxin: a polluter working with the pentagon 39as possible the first a<strong>to</strong>mic bombs in his<strong>to</strong>ry, those that were <strong>to</strong> be droppedon Hiroshima <strong>and</strong> Nagasaki in August 1945. Endowed with a $2 billionbudget, the Manhattan Project assembled the best American physicists inthe Pentagon’s nuclear weapons labora<strong>to</strong>ry in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, whileMonsan<strong>to</strong> chemists under Thomas’s direction were given a delicate mission:<strong>to</strong> isolate <strong>and</strong> then purify plu<strong>to</strong>nium <strong>and</strong> polonium, which would be used <strong>to</strong>trigger the nuclear bombs. Enjoying the Pentagon’s absolute confidence, thecompany received consent for this important work <strong>to</strong> be carried out in its researchlabora<strong>to</strong>ry in Day<strong>to</strong>n, Ohio.Promoted <strong>to</strong> vice president of Monsan<strong>to</strong> after the war, Charles Thomas<strong>to</strong>ok charge of the Clin<strong>to</strong>n Labora<strong>to</strong>ries in Oak Ridge, where he was giventhe project of developing civil applications for nuclear power for the federalgovernment, while maintaining his office in St. Louis. He ended his careeras CEO of Monsan<strong>to</strong> in 1960, at a time when his company, which had becomeone of the most powerful chemical enterprises in the <strong>world</strong>, was about<strong>to</strong> secure the largest contract in its his<strong>to</strong>ry: the production of Agent Orangefor the Vietnam War.Operation Ranch H<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Agent Orange“<strong>The</strong> Ranch H<strong>and</strong> operation was unique in the his<strong>to</strong>ry of American arms,<strong>and</strong> may remain so. In April 1975, President Ford formally renounced thefirst use of herbicides by the Unites States in future wars. ‘As long as thispolicy st<strong>and</strong>s,’ Major [William] Buckingham writes, ‘no operation like RanchH<strong>and</strong> could happen again.’” 12 <strong>The</strong>se are the words of Richard H. Kohn inforeword <strong>to</strong> a book by Buckingham published by the Office of Air Force His<strong>to</strong>ryin 1982 covering the use of herbicides in Southeast Asia from 1961 <strong>to</strong>1971.<strong>The</strong> advantage of this book, which carefully avoids considering the health<strong>and</strong> ecological consequences of the massive spraying of defoliants in SouthVietnam, is that it presents in clinical technical detail the genesis of thechemical warfare waged by the United States under the euphemistic titleRanch H<strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> the great benefit of multinationals such as Dow Chemical<strong>and</strong>, of course, Monsan<strong>to</strong>. It also tells us that “herbicides, or weed-killingchemicals, had long been used in American agriculture” <strong>and</strong> that the first experimentalairborne spraying of pesticides <strong>to</strong>ok place near Troy, Ohio, on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!