13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the iron law of the patenting of life 209where he <strong>to</strong>ok plant samples <strong>and</strong> pho<strong>to</strong>graphs. <strong>The</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne was often threatening,even brutal. Sometimes no agent ever appeared, but the grower wassent a summons on the basis of a “dossier” made up of aerial views <strong>and</strong>analyses of plants taken from the farmer’s property without his or her knowledge.Not infrequently, farmers who were sued denied that they could bebound by a technology agreement (twenty-five out of ninety), because thedealer who sold them the seed had never talked about it, because they signedwithout really reading it, or because the practice was so out of the ordinary.This was the case for Homan McFarling, a Missouri farmer sued in 2000 forhaving “saved RR soybean seed,” something he never denied. <strong>The</strong> trial verdictrequired him <strong>to</strong> pay 120 times the cost of the saved seed, or $780,000,<strong>according</strong> <strong>to</strong> the terms of the agreement, which he didn’t even remembersigning <strong>and</strong> of which he didn’t have a copy. He appealed <strong>and</strong>, unusually, wona reduction in damages: the court questioned “the constitutionality of a contractasking for enormous damages for what was a very small actual loss.” 14<strong>The</strong> amount he finally paid is unknown.Others were penalized even though they didn’t know they were growingGM crops. For example, Hendrik Hartkamp, a native of the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s,bought a ranch in Oklahoma in 1998. On the property he found a s<strong>to</strong>re ofsoybean seeds, which he planted. On April 3, 2000, he was sued by Monsan<strong>to</strong>for “patent law violation,” because some of his seeds were transgenic.After ruining himself in conducting his defense, he sold his ranch at a loss<strong>and</strong> left the United States for good. “<strong>The</strong> terrible thing,” Joseph Mendelson<strong>to</strong>ld me, “is that courts don’t distinguish between those who knowingly reusetheir seeds <strong>and</strong> those who did not plant GMOs intentionally. <strong>The</strong> only thingthat counts is that the gene was found in a field: whatever the reason, theowner of the field is held liable.” When a farmer claimed that he had neversigned a contract but settled for $100,000 (hence remaining anonymous),a Monsan<strong>to</strong> representative re<strong>to</strong>rted with remarkable frankness: “We ownyou—we own anybody that buys our Roundup Ready products.” 15<strong>The</strong> CFS report also reveals that for at least six of the ninety suits filed byMonsan<strong>to</strong> the agreement presented by the company had a forged signature,“a practice documented as common among seed dealers.” This happened,for example, <strong>to</strong> Eugene Stratemeyer, an Illinois farmer who fell in<strong>to</strong> a trapset by an “inspec<strong>to</strong>r”: in July 1998, a man appeared at his farm <strong>and</strong> asked <strong>to</strong>buy a small quantity of seeds. Since the planting season was over, he explainedthat he wanted <strong>to</strong> do an erosion test. Stratemeyer agreed <strong>to</strong> help him

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!