13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the invention of gmos 137nomic procedure cannot be identified with the techniques of genetic manipulation,which, rather than respecting the natural laws of plant development,attempt instead <strong>to</strong> break them in any way possible.Molecular biologists knew very well that plant organisms possess defensemechanisms designed <strong>to</strong> protect them from the intrusion of foreign bodies,including, of course, genes coming from other living species. From the verybeginning, those biologists unders<strong>to</strong>od that genetic manipulation could notbe carried out without using an intermediary, or a “mule,” able <strong>to</strong> transportthe selected gene <strong>and</strong> make it enter by force in<strong>to</strong> the target cell. For this purpose,they turned <strong>to</strong> a bacterium that is abundant in the soil, Agrobacteriumtumefaciens, which has the capacity <strong>to</strong> insert some of its genes in<strong>to</strong> plantcells <strong>to</strong> cause tumors.* In other words, this bacterium is a pathogen thatchanges the genetic inheritance of cells by infecting them.In 1974, a Belgian research team succeeded in identifying the plasmid (aring of DNA) constituting the vec<strong>to</strong>r by which the gene that induces the tumoris transferred from the bacterium <strong>to</strong> the plant. In St. Louis, as in labora<strong>to</strong>riesaround the <strong>world</strong> at the time, they then attempted <strong>to</strong> isolate in theplasmid the gene responsible for the tumors <strong>and</strong> replace it with the gene ofinterest by adding a gene “promoter,” a sequence of DNA that triggers theexpression of the gene <strong>to</strong> be triggered. <strong>The</strong> gene in question is often 35S,from the cauliflower mosaic virus, which is related <strong>to</strong> the hepatitis B virus,raising the alarm of some opponents of unrestricted tinkering with genes.But there was more: if the gene-inducing tumors had been suppressed,how could one know that the plasmid was doing its work <strong>and</strong> inserting thesubstitute gene in the plant cell? <strong>The</strong> only solution the sorcerer’s apprenticesfound was <strong>to</strong> attach <strong>to</strong> the genetic construction what they called a“selection marker,” in this case a gene resistant <strong>to</strong> antibiotics, usuallykanamycin. To verify that the transfer had actually taken place, the cellswere sprayed with an antibiotic solution, <strong>and</strong> the “chosen” were those thatsurvived this shock treatment. (This gave rise <strong>to</strong> further health concerns—at a time when resistance <strong>to</strong> antibiotics was in the process of becoming a seriouspublic health problem, some Cass<strong>and</strong>ras were afraid that the selectionmarker would be absorbed by bacteria populating the human intestinaltract, reducing medicine’s ability <strong>to</strong> fight infectious agents.)*Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall disease, which attacks the roots of some plants by inducingthe growth of a tumor. It was discovered by two American researchers in 1907.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!