13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the invention of gmos 139obsessed by only one thing: finding the gene that would immunize plantcells against Roundup. This was especially urgent because Calgene, a Californiastart-up, had just announced in a letter published in Nature that ithad succeeded in making <strong>to</strong>bacco resistant <strong>to</strong> glyphosate. 11 Discussionswere already under way on an agreement with the French company Rhône-Poulenc <strong>to</strong> develop crops resistant <strong>to</strong> glyphosate. At the same time, the Germancompany Hoechst was going all out <strong>to</strong> find the gene resistant <strong>to</strong> itsherbicide Basta, not <strong>to</strong> mention DuPont (Glean) <strong>and</strong> Ciba-Geigy (atrazine).In short, all the chemical giants were pursuing the same goal, because thestakes were primarily economic: companies were already imagining the patentsthey could file on all the major food crops in the <strong>world</strong>.In St. Louis, stress <strong>to</strong>ok up permanent residence, because the no<strong>to</strong>riousgene remained elusive. Jaworski’s researchers were going around in circles.<strong>The</strong>y had succeeded in identifying the gene responsible for the enzyme that,as I reported in Chapter Four, is blocked by the action of glyphosate molecules,causing tissue necrosis <strong>and</strong> plant death. <strong>The</strong> idea was <strong>to</strong> manipulateit so as <strong>to</strong> deactivate the reaction <strong>to</strong> the herbicide, <strong>and</strong> then introduce it in<strong>to</strong>plant cells, but nothing worked. “It was like the Manhattan Project,” saidHarry Klee, a member of the research team. “<strong>The</strong> antithesis of how a scientistusually works. A scientist does an experiment, evaluates it, makes a conclusion<strong>and</strong> goes on <strong>to</strong> the next variable. With Roundup resistance we weretrying twenty variables at the same time: different mutants, different promoters,multiple plant species. We were trying everything at once.” 12<strong>The</strong> search lasted for more than two years, until the day in 1987 when engineersthought of rummaging through the garbage in Monsan<strong>to</strong>’s Lulingplant, located 450 miles south of St. Louis. At this site on the banks of theMississippi, Monsan<strong>to</strong> produced millions of <strong>to</strong>ns of glyphosate annually. Decontaminationpools were supposed <strong>to</strong> treat production residues, but some ofthe residues had contaminated nearby l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> ponds. Samples were taken<strong>to</strong> collect thous<strong>and</strong>s of microorganisms in order <strong>to</strong> detect the ones that hadnaturally survived glyphosate <strong>and</strong> identify the gene that gave them that invaluableresistance. It <strong>to</strong>ok a further two years for a robot analyzing the molecularstructure of the bacteria collected <strong>to</strong> finally come up with the rarepearl. It was “a great Eureka moment,” said Stephen Padgette, one of the “inven<strong>to</strong>rs”of Roundup Ready soybeans, now a Monsan<strong>to</strong> vice president. 13But the game was far from over. <strong>The</strong>y now had <strong>to</strong> find the genetic constructthat would enable the gene <strong>to</strong> function once it was introduced in<strong>to</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!