13.07.2015 Views

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

The world according to Monsanto : pollution, corruption, and

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transgenic wheat 233prised that the label provided information on its organic composition, thenutrients, <strong>and</strong> “even the trace amounts of copper” it contained, but did notsay a word about the fact that it was a product of genetic engineering noreven that it “contain[ed] an insecticide.” He then decided <strong>to</strong> call JamesMaryanski, the biotechnology coordina<strong>to</strong>r at the FDA, who <strong>to</strong>ld him: “Bt isa pesticide, so it’s exempt” from FDA regulation <strong>and</strong> therefore falls underthe jurisdiction of the EPA. Since Pollan was going <strong>to</strong> eat his pota<strong>to</strong>es, hewanted <strong>to</strong> know if the EPA had tested their food safety. “Not exactly,”Maryanski replied. As the name indicates, “pesticides are <strong>to</strong>xic <strong>to</strong> something,”so the EPA instead establishes human “<strong>to</strong>lerances.” Pollan thencalled the EPA, where he was <strong>to</strong>ld that since “a New Leaf is nothing morethan the sum of a safe pota<strong>to</strong> <strong>and</strong> a safe pesticide,” the agency thought itposed no human health risks. Pollan goes on: “Let us assume that my pota<strong>to</strong>esare a pesticide—a very safe pesticide. Every pesticide in my gardenshed—including the Bt sprays—carries a lengthy warning label. <strong>The</strong> labelon my bottle of Bt says, among other things, that I should avoid inhaling thespray or getting it in an open wound. So if my New Leaf pota<strong>to</strong>es contain anEPA-registered pesticide, why don’t they carry some such label?”It would be hard <strong>to</strong> find a better illustration of the aberrant nature of theAmerican regula<strong>to</strong>ry system: the EPA, after being alerted <strong>to</strong> the possible allergeniceffects of StarLink corn, decided <strong>to</strong> restrict its use <strong>to</strong> animal feedinstead of simply banning it. It is worth noting the complete indifference ofthe FDA <strong>to</strong> this question; a letter sent by Alan Rulis on May 29, 1998, <strong>to</strong>AgrEvo, the Aventis subsidiary that was marketing StarLink, did not mentionthe issue at all, instead merely explaining: “As you are aware, it isAgrEvo’s continued responsibility <strong>to</strong> assure that foods the firm markets aresafe, wholesome, <strong>and</strong> in compliance with all applicable legal <strong>and</strong> regula<strong>to</strong>ryrequirements.” 27<strong>The</strong> FDA official didn’t know how right he was. By September 2000, theagency had been overwhelmed by frightened calls from around the UnitedStates. One of them came from Grace Booth, who said that at a businesslunch where she ate enchiladas, she suddenly experienced hot flashes <strong>and</strong>violent diarrhea, her lips swelled, <strong>and</strong> she lost her voice. “I felt like I was going<strong>to</strong> die,” she <strong>to</strong>ld CBS. 28 Immediately transported <strong>to</strong> a California hospital,she survived thanks <strong>to</strong> the quick administration of an anti-allergymedication. All the reports reaching the FDA spoke of violent reactionsassociated with the consumption of corn-based products. Interviewed by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!